EXTRACTION AND PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF NOVEL POTENT MUCOADHESIVE BIO-MATERIAL OBTAINED FROM THE FRESH FRUITS PULP OF ACHRAS ZAPOTILLA

Arun Kumar Singh1, Anita Singh2, NV Satheesh Madhav3

1Devsthali Vidyapeeth Collge of Pharmacy, Rudrapur, Uttarakhand, India.

2Department Of Pharmaceutical Sciences Bhimtal Campus,Kumaun University, Nainital Uttarakhand, India.

3DIT University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mussoorie Diversion Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.

ABSTRACT

The objective of present investigation was to isolate an effective novel mucoadhesive biomaterial from the pulp of Achras zapotilla, belonging to Sapotaceae family. In the recent years the research in the biomaterial isolation and their use as pharmaceutical excipients become a core area for formulation scientist to develop safe and effective drug delivery system. The biomaterial was isolated by simplified economical method and was subjected to phytochemical, physicochemical, micromeritic as well as spectral analyses like IR, 1HNMR, DSC, SEM and Elemental analysis. The mucoadhesive property of the biomaterial was assessed by shear stress method, falling sphere method and rotating cylinder method using nasal mucosa as substrates. The results were compared with HPMC and sodium CMC as a standard. The formation of hydrogen bond by natural mucoadhesive agent with mucosa was confirmed by FTIR spectra showing carboxyl and hydroxyl groups. The research study revealed that the biomaterial obtained from fruit pulp of Acarus zapotila exhibited a promising potent natural mucoadhesive property and may be used to develop mucoadhesive transmucosal drug delivery systems.

Keywords: Achras zapotilla, mucoadhesive property, Nasal mucosa, shear stress testing, thermal analysis.

 

INTRODUCTION

Pharmaceutical drug delivery system the excipients play a vital role in the development of dosage forms, suitable for administration to patients. In recent years, excipients development is become core area of research in pharmaceutical drug delivery because it influences the formulation development and drug delivery process in various ways. Biomaterials are choice of research as excipients because of its low cost, nontoxic, relatively wide spread availability, biocompatible, biodegradable, better patient compliance, eco -friendly, renewable in nature and acceptable by the regulating authorities compared to their synthetic counterparts1. Mucoadhesion, an interfacial phenomenon based on two materials, one of which is mucus layer of mucosal tissue, to which the drug is held together by means of interfacial forces for prolonged period of time2. The formation of hydrogen bond by natural mucoadhesive agent with mucosa was confirmed by FTIR spectra showing carboxyl and hydroxyl groups3.  In the recent years the interest is growing to develop a drug delivery system with the use of mucoadhesive polymer that will attach to the relative tissue for the targeting various absorptive surface mucosa such as nasal, ocular, pulmonary, buccal, vaginal etc4. The objective of this study is to isolate the biomaterial from the fruit pulp of Acarus zapotilla and to determine its intrinsic mucoadhesive property.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Acarus zapotilla fruit was obtained from the local market Haldwani, Nainital, Uttarakhand and were authenticated from Department of biotechnology Devsthali Vidyapeeth Rudrapur. Sodium CMC and HPMC and Acetone was purchased from S D Fine chemicals. Double distilled water was prepared from the institutional laboratory. All other chemicals used were of analytical grade and were freshly prepared.

Extraction of mucoadhesive biomaterial

Acarus zapotilla fruit pulp was collected after removing the upper most layer as well as seeds and minced with sufficient quantity of water. It was filtered with muslin cloth and filtrate was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min., the supernatant was collected, filtered and treated with methanol to extract the biomaterial. The extracted biomaterial was washed repeatedly with methanol, collected, purified by dialysis method and dried at 50-600C under vacuum for 12 h. The dried biomaterial was pulverized and passed through 120 mesh sieve to get uniform size particles and stored in desiccators till further use. Percentage yield of isolated biomaterial was calculated. The percentage yield of isolated biomaterial was calculated5, 6.

PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF BIOMATERIAL

The dried biomaterial was studied for percentage yield, appearance, solubility, viscosity, pH, swelling index, and bulk and tapped densities, angle of repose, compression properties.

Percentage yield

 The percentage yield of biomaterial was calculated on the amount of fruit pulp used for extraction process and amount of dry powder obtains individually depend upon solvents used7. The percentage yield was calculated using the formula mentioned below,

                   

Organoleptic evaluation

The organoleptic evaluation refers to the evaluation of color, odor, shape, taste and special features which include touch and texture. The majority of information on the identity, purity and quality of the material can be drawn from these observations8 (Table 2).

Solubility

The Solubility of biomaterial was determined in different common solvents (Table 3).

Loss on drying

Weight loss on drying was determined for an appropriate quantity of biomaterial at 1050C for two hours and percentage loss of moisture on drying was calculated using formula9 (Table 1).

Determination of pH of the polymer

The pH of 1% solution of the biomaterial was determined using a digital pH meter.

Density

A 0.5%w/v solution of dried mucilage was prepared and transferred to a density measurable bottle. An empty bottle with distilled water was weighed. The density of the dried mucilage was calculated10.

Swelling index

The Swelling index is the volume in ml occupied by 1g of the substance. The Swelling index of the mucilage powder was determined by according to British Pharmacopoeia. One gram of biomaterial powder was accurately weighed and transferred to a 100mL stoppered measuring cylinder. The initial volume of the powder in the measuring cylinder was noted. The volume was made up to 100 mL mark with distilled water. The cylinder was stoppered, shaken gently and set aside for 24 h. The volume occupied by the gum sediment was noted after 24 h11 (Table 1).

The swelling ratio was calculated by determining the ratio of swollen volume to the initial bulk Volume using the formula.   


Where;

S = swelling index

V1 = volume occupied by the biomaterial prior to hydration

V2 = volume occupied by the biomaterial after hydration.

Determination of particle size distribution

Biomaterial was sprinkled on glass slide containing Glycerin and examined through using calibrated eye piece micrometer under microscope. About 100 particles size were counted in different fields and particle size distribution of mucilage shown in Figure 1, the particle size distribution result is mentioned in Table 4.

Bulk and tapped density

A pre weighed quantity of dried mucilage was poured into a graduated cylinder, and the volume recorded. The bulk density was obtained by dividing the weight of the sample by volume of the sample contained in the cylinder. Tapped density of biomaterial was determined by USP-II method and it is the ratio of weight of dry powder to its tapped volume (Table 1). The volume of powdered bed is measured after each increment of 250 drops until the difference of last two volume measurement is zero11. The bulk and tapped densities were calculated using the formula-

Angle of repose

The angle of repose was determined by the fixed height funnel method.  The dried biomaterial powder was carefully poured through the funnel until the apex of the conical pile just touched the tip of the funnel. The maximum cone height (h) of the pile and radius (r) of the base of the pile was determined and angle of repose was calculated12.

Angle of repose


Carr's Index and Hausner’s Ratio:

Carr's index and Hausner’s ratio were calculated from the bulk and tapped densities using the formula-

Viscosity

The viscosity of freshly prepared 1% w/v solution of biomaterial was determined using Brookfield viscometer12. The resulted values are mentioned in Table 1.

Ash Values

 Ash values such as total ash, acid insoluble ash and water-soluble ash were determined according to Indian Pharmacopoeia. The following procedures were used for determination of ash values (Table 5).

Total Ash

Total ash value was determined by taking three grams of biomaterial in a silica crucible The biomaterial powder was spread as a fine, even layer on the bottom of the crucible and ignited by gradually increasing the temperature to 5500C until it is white, indicating the absence of carbon. The crucible was cooled in a desiccator and weighed. The procedure was repeated to get constant weight. The percentage of total ash was calculated with reference to air dried sample12.

Acid Insoluble Ash

The ash obtained as described above was boiled with 25 mL of dilute Hydrochloric acid for five minutes and filtered through an ash less filter paper. The insoluble ash was transferred into a silica crucible, ignited and weighed. The procedure was repeated to get a constant weight13. The percentage of acid insoluble ash was calculated.

Water-soluble Ash

The total ash obtained as described above was boiled for 5 min with 25 mL of water and filtered through an ash less filter paper. The insoluble ash was transferred into a silica crucible, ignited for 15 min, and weighed a. The procedure was repeated to get a constant weight. The weight of insoluble matter was subtracted from the weight of the total ash. The difference of weight was considered as water-soluble ash. The percentage of water-soluble ash was calculated13 (Table 5).

Preliminary Phytochemical Screening of Isolated biomaterial

Aqueous solution of extracted biomaterial was used for phytochemical characterization. Test for carbohydrates, proteins, mucilage, alkaloids, fats, tannins amino acids, gums and polyphenols were perform according to standard procedure mentioned in literatures 13-15 (Table 6)..

ANALYTICAL EVALUATION OF BIOMATERIAL

Elemental analysis

Elemental analysis of carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen was carried using a Leco CHN-2000 determinator. A Perkin-Elmer Elemental Analyzer was used for the determination of oxygen16 (Table 7).

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

 DSC curve of Acarus zapotilla was obtained by a Differential Scanning Calorimeter at heating rate of 10°C/min from 30 to 300°C in nitrogen atmosphere (30mL/min)17 (Figure 2).

Surface Characteristics by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The SEM photograph of dried isolated biomaterial (powdered sample) was obtained by Scanning Electron Microscope (Jeol, JSM-840A, Japan) with 20Kv accelerating voltage (Figure 3).

PXRD Pattern

Diffraction pattern of powdered sample was recorded with an X-ray diffractometer. X-ray diffraction was performed at room temperature (25oC) with a diffractometer; target, Cu (λ=1.54Å), filter, Ni; Voltage, 45kV; current 40mA; time constant 10mm/s; scanning rate 20/min; measured from 10-350 at full scale 200 (Figure 4).

FTIR study

The FTIR spectrum of the sample was recorded using a FTIR spectrometer (Perkin Elmer1600, USA), using potassium bromide (KBr) disc prepared from powdered samples mixed with dry KBr in the ratio 1:20018. It was scanned from 4000 to 400 cm-1. Triplicate measurements were made and the spectrum with the clearest identifiable peaks was chosen (Figure 5 and Table 7).

NMR Spectrum of Manilkara Zapota Polymer

NMR spectra of 1H and 13C of mucilage was recorded using NMR (400 MHz) spectrometer (Bruker Avance II 400 NMR Spectrophotometer)19.

Acute toxicity study

Acute toxicity study was performed according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation Development (OECD) guidelines No 425 (OECD guidelines, 2008). The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee (Registration No 1452/PO/a/11/CPCSEA). Animals were randomly distributed into two groups, each group comprising five animals. Group I consisted of control animals that received equivalent volume of water as vehicle. Group II animals received test dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight the rats were fasted overnight and were then administrated with freshly prepared solution of biomaterials in water. A test dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight was used. Five rats of both sex will be taken to perform acute oral toxicity studies. biomaterials was dissolve in  water give per oral to overnight fasted rats and animal will be observed for the sign of acute toxicity for a period of 14 days by observing changes in the skin, corneal reflex, respiratory rate, autonomic symptoms, salivation, diarrhoea, lethargy, sleep, behavioral patterns, and convulsions and compared with the control group animals20,21.

ASSESSMENT OF MUCOADHESIVE PROPERTIES

Shear stress measurement

The mucoadhesive property of biomaterial was determined in vitro by shear stress method, ex-vivo by Park and Robinson method and rotating basket method. the shear stress measure the force that cause a mucoadhesive to slide with respect to the mucus layer in parallel to their place of contact of adhesion. The test was performed by using different concentration of mucoadhesive solution ranging from 1 to 5%. A specified amount of solution was subjected for measuring the weight required for bond breaking at various contact intervals that is 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes. Similar procedure was employed for HPMC and sodium CMC polymers22 (Table 8 and Figure 8).

Falling Sphere method

Falling sphere method was studied to determine mucoadhesive strength in terms of time in second required for mucoadhesive agent coated grain to fall 50 divisions in the burette filled with 10% mucus solution. Mustard grains which retained on sieve no 12 were taken and dipped in isolated biomaterial, HPMC and NaCMC solution of various concentration, 1.0, 2.0 and 3%w/v respectively. Grains were dried at 300C and then each grains were slowly placed at the top layer of 10 % mucus solution in the burette. Time taken by the grains to fall 50 divisions in the burette was noted and values were tabulated23, 24 (Table 9 and Figure 9). Rotating cylinder method

In this method the mucoadhesive property was evaluated by nasal mucosa. The biomaterial film was prepared by solvent casting method. The nasal mucosa was paced around rotating basket and the prepared film was adhered on this labial mucosa. It was allowed for rotation at 100 rpm. The detachment time of film from mucosal substrate was noted at regular intervals and data was compared with standard film of HPMC and sodium CMC polymer25.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The percentage yield of biomaterial obtained from the fruit pulp of Acarus zapotilla was found to be 39% (w/w). The isolated biomaterial was subjected for various physicochemical tests like pH, swelling index, bulk and tapped density, carr’s index and Hausner’s ratio, angle of repose, %LOD and viscosity. Swelling index of the Acarus zapotilla biomaterial was found to be 19±0.23%. High value of swelling index shows the high swelling ability of biomaterial. The swelling ability of any biomaterial depends upon its water retention capacity or water absorption capacity. The biomaterial was characterized by various organoleptic properties such as colour, odour, taste, shape, appearance and nature as shown Table 2. The solubility behaviour of the biomaterial indicates that it is quickly soluble and forms viscous colloidal solution in warm water, sparingly soluble in cold water, whereas insoluble in ethanol, methanol, acetone, Cyclohexane, Chloroform, Benzene and ether. The particle size distribution of biomaterial was determined and their data are tabulated (Table 4 and Figure 1)

The purity of biomaterial was determined by prescribed phytochemical tests, which indicated the absence of alkaloids, steroids, flavonoids, tannins and phenols. Only carbohydrates saponins and mucilage were found to be present, which confirms the purity. From the Elemental analysis it was found that the Acarus zapotilla biomaterial have high carbon hydrogen ratio.

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) measures the heat loss or gain, resulting from physical or chemical changes within a sample as a function of temperature. A sharp symmetric melting endotherm can indicate relative purity, whereas broad asymmetric curve suggests impurities or more than one thermal process. The endothermic peak usually indicates the loss of water present in the compound. The DSC curve of Acarus zapotilla  showed two broad endothermic peaks at temperature 90.3°C and 215.3°C. The SEM photographs of Acarus zapotilla biomaterial (Figure 3) have revealed that the shape of the biomaterial was found to be irregular.

The X-ray diffraction pattern of biomaterial obtained from Acarus zapotilla (Figure 4) did not show any characteristic peak, which indicates amorphous nature. IR spectroscopy is a useful tool in identification as well as purity of a compound. The principal absorption peaks of biomaterial was interpreted (Figure 5) and data are tabulated in Table 8.

NMR Study

1H NMR of Acarus zapotilla biomaterial showed chemical shift at 1.2 ppm (-C≡CH, acetylenic proton), 2.5 ppm (-C≡CH, acetylenic proton), 3.2-4.6 ppm (-CH3OR, ether) proton), 4.6 ppm (-C=CH, vinylic proton),4.9 ppm (R-OH, hydroxyl proton) and 7.5 ppm (Ar-H, aromatic proton) (Figure 6).

In acute toxicity studies, the test animals did not reveal any significant change in their body weight, corneal reflex, respiratory rate and autonomic symptoms. No skin reaction, salivation diarrhea, lethargic conditions, sleeping conditions and convulsions were observed on the animals. So it clearly revealed that biomaterial was non toxic in nature. Acarus zapotilla biomaterial (5%) showed shear stress value 154 gm after 30 minutes, which was comparable to HPMC 3% and Sodium CMC 3% solution.

In falling sphere method the coated mustard grains of size 1.0 to 1.1mm were allowed to move top to bottom in 50 ml burette containing 10% mucus solution. Mucoadhesion time was determined and compared with standard Figure 8. From the study it was found that the isolated mucoadhesive agent was shown comparable mucoadhesion as compared to the standard. Acarus zapotilla biomaterial showed dislodgement time 95 minutes from nasal mucosal substrate of goat, which was more than sodium CMC (90 minutes) and less than HPMC (105 minutes) Figure 7. These results suggested that Acarus zapotilla biomaterial possessed an appreciable mucoadhesive property.

CONCLUSION

In the present study the biomaterial was successfully isolated from Acarus zapotilla with a good percentage yield by a simple economic process. The isolated biomaterial shows promising inbuilt mucoadhesion property when compared against HPMC and NaCMC. It is also confirmed by presence of hydroxyl and carbonyl functional groups in FTIR spectrum which are responsible for mucoadhesion. Hence conclusion was drawn that it can serve as a potential excipient for formulating transmucosal drug delivery systems. Since this natural mucoadhesive agent is edible, it is easily biodegradable and may provide an alternative to conventional synthetic/ semisynthetic mucoadhesive agents.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST 

No conflict of interest associated with this work.

REFERENCES

  1. Singh AV. Biopolymers in drug delivery. Pharmacologyonline. 2011;1: 666-674
  2. Gandhi RB, Robinson JB. Bioadhesion in drug delivery systems.Medical process through technology. 1989; 15:21-46.
  3. Madsen F, Eberth K, Smart J. A rehological assessment of the nature of interactions between mucoadhesive polymers and a homogenized mucus gel, Biomaterials. 1998; 19: 1083-1092.
  4. Mathiowitz E, Chickering D, Jacob JS, Santos C. In: Mathiowitz E (eds.) Encyclopedia of controlled drug delivery, Vol. 1, New York; John Willey and Sons. 1999; 9-44.
  5. Mistry S, Biswal PK, Mishra B, Sahoo S. Isolation, Characterization and Pharmaceutical evaluation of the mucilage from Polyalthia suberosa Int J Pharm Tech Res. 2010; 2: 1455-1459.
  6. Ojha A, Satheesh Madhav NV. Isolation and characterization of novel mucoadhesive biomaterial from Phoenix dactylifera. Int Curr Pharm J. 2012; 1(8): 205-208.
  7. Ramu G, Krishna Mohan G, Jayaveera KN, Preliminary investigation of Patchapassali mucilage (Basella alba) as tablet binder. Int J Green Pharm. 2011, 5(1), 24-27.
  8. Indian Pharmacopeia, Ministry of Health and family welfare, Government of India, Controller of Publications, New Delhi. 1996; A-54.
  9. Anonymous, Quality control methods for medicinal plant materials, World Health Organization, Geneva. 2002; 8 (28): 45-46.
  10. Anonymous, The Ayurvedic pharmacopoeia of India, 1st edition, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. 2001; 1(3): 29-31.
  11. Bharadia PD et al., A preliminary investigation on sesbania gum as a pharmaceutical excipients. Int J Pharm Excip. 2004; 1(4): 102-105.
  12. Sink PJ, Martins. Physical pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences, 5th Edition, B.I publications Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, 2006; 553-556.
  13. Lala PK. Practical Pharmacognosy. Lina Guha Publication: India; 1981.
  14. Kokate CK. Practical Pharmacognosy, 3rd New Delhi, India,Vallabh Prakashan, 1991.
  15. Gupta MK. Textbook of Natural Products, Volume IV, 1st, Meerut; Pragati Prakashan: 2009.
  16. Silverstein RM, Webster FX. Spectroscopic identification of organic compounds, 6th, New Delhi; Wiley India Pvt. Ltd: 2010.
  17. Sharma Y R et al. Elementary organic spectroscopy, principles and chemical applications, S Chand and Co. Ltd, New Delhi. 2010, 89-150.
  18. Kalsi PS. Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds. New Age International Publishers, 6th 2007; 65-183.
  19. Beckett AH and Stenlake JB: Practical pharmaceutical chemistry, Part II. CBS Publishers, Delhi, 4th 2004; 72-75.
  20. OECD 423 guideline for testing of chemicals acute oral toxicity-acute oral class method. 2001.
  21. Satheesh Madhav NV, Uma Shankar MS. (A novel smart mucoadhesive biomaterial from Lallimantia royalena seed coat). Science Asia. 2011; 37: 69–71.
  22. Peh KK, Wong CF. Polymeric film as vehicle for buccal drug delivery: mechanical and bioadhesive properties. J Pharm Pharmaceutics sci.1998; 2:53-61.
  23. Teng CL, Ho NF. Mechanistic studies in the simultaneous flow and adsorption of polymer coated latex particles on intestinal mucus-I methods and physical model development. J Cont Rel. 1987; 6: 133-149.
  24. Ranga Rao KV, Buri P. A novel in situ method to test polymers and coated micro particles for bioadhesion. Int J Pharm. 1989; 52: 265-70.
  25. Satheesh Madhav NV, Yadav AP. A novel translabial platform utilizing bioexcipients from Litchi chinesis for the delivery of rosiglitazone maleate. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2013; 3(6): 408–15.

 

Figure 1: Graphical representation of particle size distribution of Acarus zapotilla   biomaterial

 

Table 1: Physicochemical property of Acarus zapotilla biomaterial

Property

Results

Bulk density (g/cc)

0.76

Tapped density(g/cc)

0..89

True density (g/cc) 0.5%W/v solution

2.52

Angle of repose

27.23

Compressibility index (%)

15

Hausner Ratio

1.17

pH (1%w/v solution)

5.5±0.010

Swelling index (%) in DW

19±0.23

Viscosity (1%w/v solution)

1.028 cp

Color Change Temperature

122-1240C

Loss on drying %

4.3

 

Table 2: Organoleptic evaluation of selected polysaccharide

Parameter

Acarus zapotilla Biomaterial

Color

Light brown

Odour

Odourless

Taste

Tasteless

Shape

Irregular

Appearance

Amorphous

Nature

Powder

 

Table 3: Solubility behavior of the biomaterial

Solvent use

Solubility behaviour

Cold water (8-250c)

Sparingly soluble

Warm water (35-400c)

Soluble forming a viscous colloidal solution

Ethanol

Insoluble

Methanol

Insoluble

Acetone

Insoluble

Ether

Insoluble

Cyclohexane

Insoluble

Chloroform

Insoluble

Benzene

Insoluble

Figure 2: Graphical representation of differential scanning calorimetry

Table 4: Particle size distribution of Acarus zapotilla biomaterial

S. N.

Size range (μ m)

Number of particles

1.

0-20

6

2.

20-40

21

3.

40-60

39

4.

60-80

15

5.

80-100

7

6.

100-120

12

 

Table 5: Ash Values of Acarus zapotilla Biomaterial

S. N.

Types of Ash

Ash Value in %w/w

1

Total ash

4.9 %

2

Acid insoluble ash

0.48 %

3

Water  soluble  ash

4.3 %

 

Table  6: Phytochemical Characterization of Extracted  Polymer from Acarus Zapotilla

SN

Test

Result

1

Test for alkaloids

                               Wagner’s test

                                Mayer test

                                Dragendroff test

 

-

-

-

2

Test for Carbohydrates (Molisch’s test)

+

3

Test for saponin (foam test)

+

4

Test for proteins     Ninhydrin test

                                Biuret test

-

-

5

Test for Tannins  (Ferric chloride test)

                            (Aquous bromine test)

-

-

6

Test for mucilage ( Ruthenium red test)

+

7

Test for reducing sugar (Felhing’s test)

+

8

Test for chlorides( silver nitrate test)

-

9

Test for sulphates (barium chloride test)

-

10

Test for starch (added  iodine)

-

11

Test for flavonoid  Shinoda test

                               Alkaline reagent test

-

-

Table 7: Micro-elemental analysis of Acarus zapotilla  biomaterial

        Element

     % Compostion

Carbon

36.95

Nitrogen

0.56

Hydrogen

9.14

 

Table 8: Interpretation of IR peaks.

IR peaks (cm-1)

(acarus zapotilla)

Interpretation

1012.66

C-H Bending

1246.06

C-O Stretching

1735.99

C=O Stretching

2742.87

CH2 C-H Stretching

2875.96

Alkyl C-H Stretching

2933.83

Alkyl C-H Stretching

3400

O-H (Alcohol) Stretching(broad)

 

Figure 3: Surface characteristics by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

 

Table 9: Mucoadhesive property determined by shear stress method

Polymer

Concentration %w/v

Weight required to detach glass plate(gm)

At the time interval (n=3)

5 min

10 min

15 min

20 min

25 min

30 min

Isolated Biomaterial

1%

7.3

9.6

12.8

16.2

23.5

29.8

2%

13.5

18.1

24.3

29.8

36.6

48.2

3%

21.2

27.8

34.7

38.1

47.3

58.9

4%

33.7

41.2

48.6

56.7

65.3

86.4

5%

44.6

53.7

67.8

87.6

114.5

154.4

HPMC

3%

58.3

65.1

73.7

95.2

112.3

152.8

NaCMC

3%

54.7

61.4

73.9

97.6

116.7

154.8

 

 

Figure 4: X-ray Diffraction of the biomaterial.

Table 10: Falling sphere analysis of polymer

Polymer

Concentration

Average time (sec) taken  (n=3)

Isolated Biomaterial

1%

10.33

2%

28.21

3%

33.88

4%

43.69

5%

56.22

HPMC

3%

32.33

NaCMC

3%

32.12

 

             Figure 5: FTIR graph of the biomaterial

  

Figure 6: NMR spectra of the biomaterial.

  

Figure 7: Graphical representation of shear stress study

Table 11: Dislodgement time determine by rotating basket method in nasal mucosa

S. N

Polymer

Dislodgement time (min)

1.        

Acarus zapotilla biomaterial

95

2.        

HPMC

105

3.        

NaCMC

90

 

Figure 8: Graphical representation of falling sphere method

  

Figure 9: Graphical representation of dislodgement time determine by rotating cylinder method in nasal mucosa