PREVALENCE, TYPING, AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS OF ORAL CANDIDA COLONIZATION IN DENTURE WEARING AND FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE COMPARING TO NORMAL TEETH INDIVIDUALS 

 Ebtihal Mohamed Madar1,2image, Khaled Saad Abdulrahman Al-Khamesy3image

Hassan Abdulwahab Al-Shamahy1,2image, Al-Kasem Mohammed A Abbas4image

1Medical Microbiology and Clinical Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana’a University. 

2Basic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Republic of Yemen.

3ENT Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana’a University, Republic of Yemen. 

4Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana’a University, Republic of Yemen.

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives: Oral Candida colonization (OCC) is one of the most common opportunistic fungal infections among people who wear dentures and have FOA. The prevalence of OCC and Candida among denture patients and FOA patients may change due to the presence of these dental appliances. This study aims to identify the different Candida species, determine the prevalence of OCC in 3 groups of individuals with removable or fixed dentures and fixed orthodontic appliances (FOA) compared with a control group of people with natural teeth and study the risk factors associated with contracting oral Candida species among these groups.

Subjects and methods: The investigational group was selected from denture and orthodontic patients who were clinically examined at the earliest time to obtain basic information before any effective treatment of dental infection. The group included 104 dental patients; 104 fixed orthodontic appliance (FOA) patients and 102 controls. The oral mucosa of each participant was first swabbed and then placed in a liquid medium. Then, after creating successive dilutions and applying them to Sabouraud dextrose agar, the isolates were diagnosed by culturing them on Candida agar with color, observing the colony characteristics of the species, in addition to studying the biochemical reactions to confirm the species.

Results: Of the 108 persons with OCC, 44 (34.8%) had a positive OCC. 148 oral Candida spp. were found in 108 OCC patients.  C. albicans (49.1%) was the most frequently isolated species, followed by C. glabrata (35.2%) and C. dubliniensis (13%). C. kefyr, C. krusei, C. famata, C. africana, and C. stellatoidea were initially isolated for the first time in the oral cavities of Yemeni dentistry patients. A higher rate of colonization was observed in the male group (48.5%) versus 25% in the female group, with odds ratio equal to 2.8, CI=1.7–4.6, X2=18, and p<0.001. Also there was association of denture wearing (44.2%, OR=1.8, p =0.01) and older ages, (52.5%, OR= 2.3, p=0.01) with high rate of oral candida colonization.  

Conclusion: Candida colonization remains a major problem in the oral cavity. Although the prevalence of non-albicans Candida (NAC) species is increasing, C. albicans was still the dominant species. A higher rates and significant risk factors of OCC were observed in the male group, denture patients and the elderly.

Keywords: Denture, fixed orthodontic appliance (FOA), non-albicans Candida (NAC), Oral Candida colonization (OCC),  Yemen. 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Thirty to eighty percent of healthy people may harbor Candida species (Candida spp.), one of the typical components of the physiological oral microbiota1-5. Of them, Candida albicans appears to be the most common, followed by Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida krusei, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida glabrata1,6. Although the presence of Candida in the oral cavity does not always signal that a problem has been found, this fungus has all the characteristics of an oportunistic pathogen, which means that it has the potential to cause an infection in the oral cavity under specific circumstances. Candida can cause a range of illnesses, from superficial to systemic, and in severe situations, it can even be fatal7.  Mucosal resistance and factors changing the local oral environment affect the incidence of infection. These include immunological system alterations in the host, the use of antibiotics, diabetes, smoking, advancing age, pregnancy, hyposalivation, poor dental hygiene, and different kinds of dentures8-12. A patient may develop oropharyngeal candidiasis as a result of oral candidiasis13. Transplant patients also experience colonization with Candida spp. and the associated illnesses more frequently than non-transplant patients14. Moreover, there is a strong correlation between Candida and both malignant and possibly malignant oral lesions15. The information that is now available indicates that oral infections caused by Candida species are indicated by candida cell counts in concentrated oral rinse samples of more than 600 CFU/mL16,17.

The preservation of saliva is crucial in the fight against oral candidiasis. Candida reproduction is inhibited by lubrication, cleaning, hydration, and antimicrobial action based on elements such lactoferrin, lysozyme, sialoperoxidase, and histidine-rich polypeptides18,19. As a result, factors that cause changes in salivary quantity and quality also foster the growth of infection through salivary reproduction. This may lower the salivary flow rate and result in the formation of lesions in the salivary glands18. Furthermore, it has been discovered that patients who wear dentures are more likely than those who do not to have Candida spp. invade their mucosa4,7,20,21.  The narrow space between the denture and mucosa between removable dentures creates an ideal environment for unrestricted Candida reproduction because they replace a portion of the resorbed alveolar ridge next to the missing teeth and have a wide contact area with oral mucosa3,12,20.

Cobalt-chromium alloys (Co-Cr) and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) are materials utilized in the denture base's manufacture. Because of their inherent characteristics, the materials used to make prosthetic appliances have the potential to directly impact the amount of Candida present in the oral cavity (mainly through variations in surface structure, such as the degree of porosity, roughness, and surface-free energy, which influence the adherence of microorganisms and plaque formation). Similar to PMMA-based materials22, appliances with a cast metal base made from Co-Cr alloys have a more stable and smooth surface and are not susceptible to the development of surface porosity, with the exception of cases of non-intimate adhesion of the compound Co–Cr and PMMA on the basis of dentures, which may act as a predilection site for fungal colonization. Thus, the use of less durable materials usually has a higher risk of Candida growth and dissemination, which might result in an oral infection that presents clinically.

Understanding the elements that lead to the development of diseases makes infection prevention easier and lowers its incidence7. Evidence currently available indicates a relationship between the occurrence of clinical oral signs and symptoms and the presence of Candida spp.23. Patients frequently describe red sores on the tongue and oral mucosa, dry mouth, and changed taste16.

With the use of innovative techniques and supplies that benefit both patients and professionals, orthodontics is a field that is always evolving24. Controlling bacterial and yeast biofilms around the arcs has been emphasized as a means of preventing the development of carious sores or oral infections in orthodontic patients4,5,20. Orthodontists are also in charge of guarding against dental caries and other oral infections while a patient is receiving treatment4,5,20,26. The orthodontic appliance functions as an alternative location where biofilms can grow27.  It is hypothesized that stainless steel feet above critical surface tension will have a better plaque retention capacity according to a study by Eliades et al.,28. Additionally, it has been discovered that metal orthodontic brackets promote particular alterations in the oral environment, such as low pH levels and the microbial inclination towards metal surfaces as a result of electrostatic responses29, as well as greater plaque accumulation and microbial colonization. Other research, however, was unable to draw any firm conclusions on possible variations in the initial convergence and adherence of microorganisms on metal, ceramic, and plastic brackets over time5,20,30,31.

This study aims to identify the different Candida species, determine the prevalence of OCC in 3 groups of individuals with removable or fixed dentures and fixed orthodontic appliances (FOA) compared with a control group of people with natural teeth, and study the risk factors associated with contracting oral Candida species among these groups.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS 

 

Over the course of two years, beginning in January 2022 and ending in June 2024 (time allowed for doctoral work), Candida tests were conducted on 310 people (104 with dentures, 104 with orthodontic abaratus, and 102 controls without dental prostheses) in the dental clinics of the Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Yemen, and the Department of Medical Microbiology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Healthy people without systemic illness or clinical indications of a Candida infection met the inclusion requirements for the selection of subjects. Furthermore, those who had smoked or were taking immunosuppressive, steroid, antibiotic, or antifungal medications at the time of the study were not allowed.

Sample Size and power:  The sample size was determined by comparing the rates of variance between cases, or patients wearing dental prostheses, and controls using computing software. If the change in OCC ratio for the control group is 2% and for the cases is 20%, then we need 102 participants in each group, with a power of 80% and a confidence level of 99.9%. A total of 310 individuals were selected: 104 were denture wearers, 104 were receiving orthodontic treatment, and 102 were acting as controls without dentures or FOA. The remaining five cases did not have any issues.

Patient sample collection for Candida Count (CFU): Two sterile cotton swabs were taken from each patient and control group in order to gather samples. Three groups of swab samples were sent to the microbiological lab after being put in Stuart transport media. At two separate points in the mouth of the patient, buccal mucosa oral swabs were taken5,25. Before culture, the collected swab was dissolved in 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline and stored at -20°C. The sample was then used for CFU calculation, culture, and Candida species determination.

Culturing Candida: On Sabouraudus dextrose agar, 100 μl of the concentrated oral sample dissolved in phosphate buffer was added, and the mixture was incubated for 48 h at 370°C. At -20°C, samples dissolved in phosphate buffer were preserved long-term. If Candida colonies appeared on Sabouraud dextrose agar, 100 μl of oral sample swab fluid was used to inoculate the chromogenic Candida agar, which was subsequently incubated for 48 h to examine the colonies. Using the manufacturer's color reference guide, colony colors were used to identify Candida species. A fermentation test involving sucrose, maltose, glucose, lactose, and galactose was performed when color identification was ambiguous. The ability of Candida species to generate chlamydospores on glutinous rice agar was another method used for their identification33.

Statistical Analysis: Epi-Info Statistics version 7 was used to screen the information. The results were expressed as percentages to describe Candida isolates by species. Data on associated risk factors were statistically analyzed by determining the odds ratio and 95% CI, and significance testing of association was performed using the chi-square test. A value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Ethical Consideration: On January 1, 2022, the Medical Ethics and Research Committee of Sana'a University's Faculty of Dentistry granted ethical permission for Contract No. 317 project. The ethical principles set forth by the review committee were consistently followed. The chosen participants provided their informed, signed consent.

 

RESULTS 

 

The study included 310 individuals, 104 with dentures, 104 with orthodontic abaratus, and 102 controls without dental prostheses, 41.9% males and 58.1 females, ranging in age from 9 to 90 years, with a mean±SD of age equal to 37.01±20.9 years old. Most of the participants were in the age group 21–30 years (25.8%), followed by ≥51 years (23.9%) and 31–40 years (22.3%). The rate of candida colonization was 34.8% (108/310) (Table 1). A total of 310 eligible study participants were included in the final statistical analysis. Of the 108 persons with OCC, 34.8% had a prevalence rate. 148 oral Candida spp. were found in 108 OCC patients.  

According to species distribution (Table 2), C. albicans (49.1%) was the most frequently isolated species throughout current study, followed by C. glabrata (35.2%) and C. dubliniensis (13%). C. kefyr, C. krusei, C. famata, C. africana, and C. stellatoidea were initially isolated for the first time in the oral cavities of Yemeni dentistry patients.  Furthermore, out of 310 individuals, mixed cultures of two to three species of Candida were discovered in 44 cases (14.2%). Co-infection with C. albicans and/or C. glabrata was most frequently detected when non-albicans species were present. Further details on co-infection of Candida species are included in Table 3.

Considering the frequency and association of oral Candida species colonizing buccal mucosa with denture cases, orthodontic cases, and normal controls, in addition to sex and age groups. The total colonization rate of oral Candida species colonizing buccal mucosa was 34.8%.

A higher rate of colonization was observed in the male group (48.5%) versus 25% in the female group, and the variance was statistically significant (p<0.001), with the associated odds ratio for male patients equal to 2.8, CI=1.7–4.6, X2=18, and p<0.001. According to age group, there was a high rate of Candida colonization in the 41–50 year old age group, equal to 52.5%, with an associated odds ratio of 2.3, CI=1.2–4.5, X2=6.3, and p=0.01. However, the mean±SD of the positive Candida colonization cases was 39.5±20.9 years higher than 37.01±20.9 years for the total participants. Comparing oral Candida species colonizing buccal mucosa rates between denture/orthodendic cases and normal control, the highest rate was with the denture group (44.2%), with an associated odds ratio equal to 1.8, CI=1.1–3.0, X2=6.1, and p=0.01. However, a lower rate of candida colonization was observed in orthodentic appliance patients, equal to 36.5%, but the results were not statistically significant (p=0.65) (Table 4).

 

DISCUSSION 

 

Although several species of Candida may be present in the oral cavity, C. albicans is unquestionably the most common16,19,34 About 80% of all recovered Candida spp. are thought to be C. albicans, and these proportions are thought to be constant in patients with and without clinical symptoms19,35. Since different species can cause infections in different ways and can definitely affect how a patient responds to medication, it is important to identify the exact species16. In addition to C. albicans, other often isolated species are C. tropicalis, C. dubliensis, and C. glabrata. However, it is not uncommon for two or more distinct species to be recovered at the same time in certain34,36,37. Current analysis revealed that C. albicans was the most frequently isolated species across all three groups of participants in this study. This finding is consistent with the findings of other studies that are currently accessible, which also indicated that C. albicans predominated19,36,37. Additionally, metal framework denture wearers and FOA are the primary populations from which C. albicans is isolated; in comparison to the control group, there was a notable rise in C. albicans colonization in these groups.The only other statistically significant difference, besides C. albicans, was discovered for colonization with C. glabrata. This result is comparable to that of Nayak et al.40, who isolated much greater quantities of C. glabrata together with C. albicans. In recent years, there has been an upsurge in the prevalence of non-albicans Candida species, particularly C. glabrata and C. krusei. Since these two species are recognized for responding inadequately to normal treatment regimens, it is imperative to determine the precise species41,42. Furthermore, the present results differed with those of Neha et al., which showed that C. tropicalis was the most frequent NCAC, followed by C. glabrata, and that C. parapsilosis was infrequently isolated from healthy oral colonization or from patient diseases41. C. kefyr, C. krusei, C. famata, C. africana, and C. stellatoidea were first isolated in Yemeni dentistry patients' oral cavities in the current investigation. These species have not been isolated in the oral cavity36,37, or even in other locations such the vaginal mucus membren43,44.

The male group in the current study had a greater colonization rate (48.5%) than the female group did, and the variance was statistically significant (p<0.001). For male patients, the related odds ratio was equivalent to 2.8, CI=1.7–4.6, X2=18, and p<0.001. The current result was consistent with earlier reports from Yemen, where it was noted that male patients had greater rates of OCC than female respondents36,37. The present findings, however, differed with those published by Thein45, who noted a comparable colonization rate in both adult sexes.

About 52% of the 41–50 year old age group in the current study had a high rate of Candida colonization, with an associated odds ratio of 2.3, CI=1.2–4.5, X2=6.3, and p=0.01. The pattern of increased OCC in cases and controls with advancing age. The results of the current study were consistent with those of studies by Chopde et al.46, and Alhasani et al. 37, which found that OCC is more common in older adults. The elderly's propensity for systemic ailments, dietary alterations, and altered salivary features can all be used to explain this conclusion39,45,47. Advancing age was also a risk factor for denture stomatitis in the elderly, because cell-mediated immunity, which provides protection against Candidal infection, declines with age. Certain oral environmental characteristics, such the age of the individuals and their unstimulated salivary flow rate, were linked to greater levels of microorganisms in the saliva of people who wear complete dentures, according to Chopde et al.46. These authors proposed that an increase in salivary microbe concentration was caused by an aging-related decrease in salivary flow rate36,48,49.

In comparing the rates of oral Candida species colonizing buccal mucosa between the denture group and the normal control, the denture group had the greatest rate (44.2%), with an odds ratio of 1.8, CI=1.1–3.0, X2=6.1, and p=0.01. The microenviro-nment of the oral cavity is altered just by the presence of prosthetic equipment, as this encourages Candida colonization and growth. Additionally, the appliance itself sticks to the mucosal surface, inhibiting natural saliva flow and physiological cleansing11,50,51. It was found in this study that, in contrast to 23.5% of people who did not use any appliances, 44.2% of subjects with prosthetic appliances tested positive for Candida spp. In comparison to data on Candida colonization in denture wearers, which indicated a percentage of positive findings in 80–100% of patients compared to 45–65% in subjects without dentures, our result is lower38. Numerous studies have established that a large majority of individuals with prosthetic appliances have candida8,35,40. Only 52% of individuals without dentures had the same results as Prakash et al.35, who demonstrated that Candida was present in nearly all people wearing prosthetic prostheses. A removable prosthetic appliance in the mouth speeds up colonization and biofilm production, but Candida's capacity to stick to surfaces and create complex biofilms serves as the first step in the onset and course of the disease. The physical characteristics of the material used in its construction also affect the denture's initial adherence to its surface. Adherence is influenced by a number of factors, including porosity, free surface energy, hydrophobicity, and surface roughness. The process of polymerization, surface changes, and denture manufacture techniques also have a major impact39. It has been shown that the previously listed material properties could influence how biofilm forms in in vitro settings.

On the other hand, patients wearing orthodontic appliances had a higher rate of candida colonization—36.5% compared to 23.5% for the control group, with a 13% increase in FOA patients (Table 4). The current study, which examined the OCC rate after fixed orthodontic treatment, finds that using these appliances increases the carriage and significantly alters the population of oral microorganisms. This is likely because the appliance causes ecological changes in the oral cavity. The OCC primary absence of the baseline patient cluster was not unexpected, as applicants were requested to ascertain good oral hygiene prior to the trial. Conversely, the test group's OCC rate increased by 13.8% following the implementation of FOA. This discovery is most likely due to the presence of orthodontic attachments on the labial and lingual surfaces of these teeth, which make it difficult to thoroughly brush the gingival tissue. Several publications have documented similar changes in the OCC rate with fixed and removable appliances during orthodontic therapy5,20,36. Additionally, the bonding material in FOA has a rough surface, which acts as a Candida trap and irritates the gingiva5,12,21,52.

Limitation of the study

Overall, our study offers intriguing new information on the first species of candida to be isolated from the oral mucous of healthy adults in Yemen; concerning C. albicans, however, it remains the most frequently colonized species in oral mucus. However, we recognize that there are certain limitations with respect to the number of participants in the research and that additional data concerning the genotyping of the candida isolates is required.

 

CONCLUSION 

 

Candida colonization remains a major problem in the oral cavity. Although the prevalence of non-albicans Candida (NAC) species is increasing, C. albicans was still the dominant species. A higher rates and significant risk factors of OCC were observed in the male group, denture patients and the elderly.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

 

The authors express their gratitude to Yemen and the Sana'a University Faculty of Dentistry for their kind assistance.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST 

 

Regarding this project, there is no conflict of interest. 

 

AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTIONS 

 

Madar EM: conducted the fieldwork for this study as part of her doctoral dissertation, writing the original draft, methodology, and investigation. Al-Khamesy KSA: formal analysis, data curation, conceptualization. Al-Shamahy HAwriting, review and editing, methodology. Abbas AMA: formal analysis, data curation, conceptualization.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Greendberg, M.; Feagans, M. Burket’s Oral Medicine, 12th; People’s Medical Publishing House: Shelton, CT, USA 2015; 91–122.
  2. Vila T, Sultan AS, Montelongo-Jauregui D, Jabra-Rizk MA. Oral Candidiasis: A disease of opportunity. J Fungi (Basel) 2020; 6(1):15.https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6010015 
  1. Hellstein JW, Marek CL. Candidiasis: Red and white manifestations in the oral cavity. Head Neck Pathol 2019 ;13(1):25-32. https://doi.org/1007/s12105-019-01004-6
  2. Al-Dossary OAE, Hassan A Al-Shamahy. Oral Candida albicans colonization in dental prosthesis patients and individuals with natural teeth, Sana’a city, Yemen. Biomed J Sci Tech Res 2018; 11(2):1-7.https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2018.11.002072  
  1. Al-Kebsi AM, Othman MO, AlShamahy HA, et al. Oral albicans colonization and non-Candida albicans candida colonization among university students, Yemen. Universal J Pharm Res 2017; 2(5):5-11.https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v2i5.R2
  1. Gerós-Mesquita Â, Carvalho-Pereira J, Franco-Duarte R, et al. Oral Candida albicanscolonization in healthy individuals: prevalence, genotypic diversity, stability along time and transmissibility. J Oral Microbiol 2020;12(1):1820292. https://doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2020.1820292  
  2. Talapko J, Juzbašić M, Matijević T, Pustijanac E, Bekić S, Kotris I, Škrlec I. Candida albicans-The virulence factors and clinical manifestations of infection. J Fungi (Basel). 2021;7(2):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7020079
  3. Bianchi CM, Bianchi HA, Tadano T, Paula CR, Hoffmann-Santos HD, Leite DP Jr, Hahn RC. Factors related to oral candidiasis in elderly users and non-users of removable dental prostheses. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2016;58:17.https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-9946201658017  
  1. Bojang E, Ghuman H, Kumwenda P, Hall RA. Immune Sensing of Candida albicans. J Fungi (Basel). 2021;7(2):119. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7020119
  2. Nguyen TG, Nguyen TTH, Tran QW. The incidence of oral candidiasis in patients with diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study in Southern Vietnam. J Crit Rev 2020; 7: 82–86.
  3. Khaled Y, Pahuja BK. Identifying the different kinds of oral Candida species in denture wearing patients. EC Dent Sci 2019; 18: 1428–1434.https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7080662  
  1. Al-Haddad KA, Al-dossary OAE, Al-Shamahy HA. Prevalence and associated factors of oral non-Candida albicans Candida carriage in denture wearers in Sana’a city-Yemen. Universal J Pharm Res 2018; 3(4): 7-11. https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v3i4.176
  2. Mardani M, Abolghasemi S, Darvishnia D, et al. Oral Candidiasis in hematological malignancy patients: Identification and antifungal susceptibility patterns of isolates. Jundishapur J Microbiol 2020, 13, 103290.https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.103290
  1. Aslam S, Rotstein C; AST Infectious Disease Community of Practice. Candida infections in solid organ transplantation: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin Transplant 2019;33(9):e13623.https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.13623  
  1. Bansal R, Pallagatti S, Sheikh S, Aggarwal A, Gupta D, Singh R. Candidal Species Identification in malignant and potentially malignant oral lesions with antifungal resistance patterns. Contemp Clin Dent 2018; 9(Suppl 2):S309-S313. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_296_18
  2. Tooyama H, Matsumoto T, Hayashi K, et al. Candida concentrations determined following concentrated oral rinse culture reflect clinical oral signs. BMC Oral Health. 2015; 15:150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0138-z
  3. Sampath A, Weerasekera M, Dilhari A, et al. Comparison of duplex PCR and phenotypic analysis in differentiating Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans from oral samples. AMB Express 2017;7(1):141.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0435-9  
  1. Ok SM, Ho D, Lynd T, et al. Candida infection associated with salivary gland-A narrative review. J Clin Med 2020; 10(1):97.https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10010097
  1. Buranarom N, Komin O, Matangkasombut O. Hyposalivation, oral health, and Candida colonization in independent dentate elders. PLoS One 2020;15(11): e0242832. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242832
  2. Al-Sanabani NF, Al-Kebsi AM, Al-Shamahy HA, Abbas AKM. Etiology and risk factors of stomatitis among Yemeni denture wearers. Universal J Pharm Res 2018; 3 (1): 69-73. https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v3i1.R9
  3. Al-Shamahy HA, Abbas AMA, Mahdie Mohammed AM, Alsameai AM. Bacterial and fungal oral infections among patients attending dental clinics in Sana’a City-Yemen. J Dent Oral Health 2018; 1(1): 1-8.https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2018.11.002072  
  1. Herbst D, Dullabh H, Sykes L, Vorster C. Evaluation of surface characteristics of titanium and cobalt chromium implant abutment materials. South Afr Dent J 2013; 68, 350–356.
  2. Alt-Epping B, Nejad RK, Jung K, Gross U, Nauck F. Symptoms of the oral cavity and their association with local microbiological and clinical findings-A prospective survey in palliative care. Support Care Cancer 2012 ;20(3):531-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1114-z
  3. Bishara SE, Damon PL, Olsen ME, Jakobsen JR. Effect of applying chlorhexidine antibacterial agent on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 1996; 66:313-316.https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1996)066<0313:EOACAA>2.3.CO;2  
  4. Shoga Al-deen HM, Ahmed Ali O, Al-Shamahy HA, et al. Oral Candida albicans colonization rate in fixed orthodontics patients. Universal J Pharm Res 2020; 5(2):1-5. https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v5i2.380
  5. Zimmer BW, Rottwinkel Y. Assessing patient-specific decalcification risk in fixed orthodontic treatment and its impact on prophylactic procedures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126:318–24.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.09.031  
  1. Van Gastel J, Quirynen M, Teughels W, Pauwels M, Coucke W, Carels C. Microbial adhesion on different bracket types in vitro. Angle Orthod 2009; 79:915-921.https://doi.org/10.2319/092908-507.1
  1. Eliades T, Eliades G, Brantley WA. Microbial attachment on orthodontic appliances: I. Wettability and early pellicle formation on bracket materials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108:351–360.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70032-3
  1. Mitchell L. Decalcification during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances-an overview. Br J Orthod 1992; 19:199–205. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.19.3.199
  2. Fournier A, Payant L, Bouclin R. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 114:414–7.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70186-6
  1. Ahn SJ, Kho HS, Lee SW, Nahm DS. Roles of salivary proteins in the adherence of oral streptococci to various orthodontic brackets. J Dent Res 2002; 81:411–415.https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100611
  1. Manaf JBA, Rahman SA, Haque S, Alam MK. Bacterial colonization and dental implants: A microbiological study. Pesqui Bras Pediatric Dentistry Clín Integr 2020; 20:e4979. https://doi.org/10.1590/pboci.2020.105
  2. Staib P, Morschhäuser J. Chlamydospore formation in Candida albicans Candida dubliniensis – An enigmatic developmental programme. Mycoses 2007; 50:1-12.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2006.01308.x
  1. Gauch LMR, Pedrosa SS, Silveira-Gomes F, Esteves RA, Marques-da-Silva SH. Isolation of Candida from denture-related stomatitis in Pará, Brazil. Braz J Microbiol. 2018;49(1):148-151.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.07.001
  1. Prakash B, Shekar M, Maiti B, Karunasagar I, Padiyath S. Prevalence of Candida spp. among healthy denture and nondenture wearers with respect to hygiene and age. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2015; 15(1):29-32.https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.155041
  1. Shoga Al-deen HM, Ahmed Ali O, Al-Shamahy HA, et al. Oral Candida albicans colonization rate in fixed orthodontics patients. Universal J Pharm Res 2020; 5(2):1-5. https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v5i2.380
  2. Alhasani AH, Al-Akwa AAY, Al-Shamahy HA, Al-deen HMS, Al-labani MA. Biofilm formation and antifungal susceptibility of candida isolates from oral cavity after the introduction of fixed orthodontic appliances. Universal J Pharm Res 2020; 5(4):21-27.https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v5i4.435
  1. Gleiznys A, Zdanaviˇcien ˙ E, E.; Žilinskas, J. Candida albicans importance to denture wearers. A literature review. Stomatologija 2015; 17: 54–66.
  2. Aslanimehr M, Rezvani S, Mahmoudi A, Moosavi N. Comparison of Candida albicans adherence to conventional acrylic denture base materials and injection molding acrylic materials. J Dent (Shiraz) 2017;18(1):61-64.
  3. Nayak S, Kavitha B, Sriram G, Saraswathi TR, Sivapathasundharam B, Dorothy AL. Comparative study of Candida by conventional and CHRO Magar method in non-denture and denture wearers by oral rinse technique. Indian J Dent Res 2012; 23(4):490-7.https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.104956  
  1. Neha A, Sumit B, Geetika A, Tehmeena Y. Candidiasis-The most common fungal infection of oral cavity. Biomed J Sci Tech Res 2018: 8:6487–6491.https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2018.08.001649
  1. Kourkoumpetis, Themistoklis. Candida infection colonization among non-trauma emergency surgery patients. Virulence 2010; 359-366.https://doi.org/10.4161/viru.1.5.12795
  1. Al-Hatami SMM, Al-Moyed KAA, Al-Shamahy HA, Al-Haddad MA, Al-Ankoshy AAM. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: Prevalence, species distribution and risk factors among non-pregnant women, in Sana’a, Yemen. Universal J Pharm Res 2021; 6(3):1-8.https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v6i3.613
  1. Al-Rukeimi AA, Al-Hatami SMM, AL-Danany DA, et al. Prevalence and risk factors associated with vulvovaginal candidiasis during pregnancy in Sana’a, Yemen. Universal J Pharm Res 2020; 5(3):1-8.https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v5i3.407
  1. Thein ZM, Samaranayake YH, Samaranayake LP. In vitro biofilm formation of Candida albicans non-albicans Candida species under dynamic anaerobic conditions. Arch Oral Biol 2007; 52:761-7.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.01.009  
  1. Chopde N, Jawale B, Phare A, et al. Microbial colonization their relation with potential cofactors in patients with denture stomatitis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13:456-9.https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00215-16
  1. Eguia A, Arakistain A, De-la-Pinta I, et al. Candida albicans biofilms on different materials for manufacturing implant abutments and prostheses. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2020 Jan 1;25(1):e13-e20.https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23157  
  1. Taha E. The effect of different denture base materials on microbial flora growth. Curr Sci 2017; 6: 314–320.
  2. Gauch LMR, Pedrosa SS, Silveira-Gomes F, Esteves RA, Marques-da-Silva SH. Isolation of Candida from denture-related stomatitis in Pará, Brazil. Braz J Microbiol 2018; 49(1):148-151.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.07.001
  1. Mothibe JV, Patel M. Pathogenic characteristics of Candida albicans isolated from oral cavities of denture wearers and cancer patients wearing oral prostheses. Microb Pathog 2017 Sep; 110:128-134.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.06.036
  1. Singh A, Verma R, Murari A, Agrawal A. Oral candidiasis: An overview. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2014 (Suppl 1):S81-5.https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-029X.141325  
  1. Saloom HF, Mohammed-Salih HS, Rasheed SF. The influence of different types of fixed orthodontic appliance on the growth and adherence of microorganisms (in vitro study). J Clin Exp Dent 2013; 5(1): e36–e41.https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.50988