DAWN OF SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY ENGINEERING LIFE AT THE MICROSCOPIC SCALE: A REVIEW

Mostafa Essam Eissaimage

Independent Researcher and Consultant, Cairo, Egypt.

 

Abstract

Synthetic biology, converging biology, engineering and computer science, allows the design of new biological systems, promising revolutions in healthcare, agriculture and environmental sustainability. Its core principles—modularity, abstraction hierarchies, orthogonality, predictability, and standardization—enable systematic biological engineering.  Modularity breaks complex systems into manageable parts, while abstraction hierarchies organize these parts by complexity. Orthogonality ensures independent function of synthetic components and predictability is achieved through modeling and computation. Standardization promotes reproducibility and collaboration. Mechanistically, synthetic biology manipulates DNA, designs genetic circuits and metabolic pathways and applies physical and computational principles. Techniques like PCR and DNA sequencing construct recombinant DNA. Genetic circuits control gene expression and metabolic engineering optimizes pathways.  Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) accelerates innovation by analyzing data, predicting protein structures and automating experiments, improving drug and therapy development.Synthetic biology can address global challenges like infectious diseases, climate change and food security, in addition to the potential applications in the medical and pharmaceutical sectors.  By understanding its principles and using advanced technologies, researchers can realize the field's potential for a better future.

Keywords: Abstraction hierarchies, AI, DNA, ML, modularity, orthogonality, PCR.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Synthetic biology is a groundbreaking area within biotechnology that combines engineering and biological principles to create and build novel biological components, devices, and systems1.  This interdisciplinary field has advanced quickly, fueled by progress in genetic engineering, computational biology, and systems biology2.  While synthetic biology holds potential for diverse applications, from environmental solutions to industrial biotechnology, its applications within the pharmaceutical industry are particularly promising and impactful3. The capacity to engineer biological systems at the microscopic level provides unparalleled opportunities for creating new therapeutics, vaccines and diagnostic tools4. Synthetic biology allows for the precise manipulation of genetic material, enabling the development of customized microorganisms that can produce complex pharmaceuticals that were previously challenging or impossible to synthesize. This concise review will examine the fundamental concepts of synthetic biology, emphasize significant technological developments, and discuss its current and future applications in pharmaceutical development. This exploratory review aims to discuss the innovative field of synthetic biology, focusing on the creation and engineering of life at the microscopic level, with a particular emphasis on its use in pharmaceutical applications.

Foundational principles of synthetic biology

Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary field that combines principles from biology, engineering and computer science to design and construct new biological entities or redesign existing biological systems for useful purposes5. This field has emerged as a powerful approach to understanding and manipulating biological systems, offering the potential to revolutionize various sectors, including healthcare, agriculture and environmental management6. The foundational principles of synthetic biology are rooted in the systematic and standardized manipulation of genetic material, enabling the creation of novel biological functions and systems7

One of the core principles of synthetic biology is the concept of modularity, which involves breaking down complex biological systems into smaller, manageable parts or modules8. These modules, often referred to as “biological parts,” can be standardized and recombined in various ways to create new functions. This approach is akin to using interchangeable parts in mechanical engineering, allowing for the rapid prototyping and testing of new biological designs9. The Registry of Standard Biological Parts, also known as the BioBrick registry, is a key resource in this regard, providing a collection of standardized DNA sequences that can be used to build synthetic biological systems.Another fundamental principle is the use of abstraction hierarchies to manage the complexity of biological systems. Abstraction in synthetic biology involves organizing biological components into different levels, such as parts, devices and systems. This hierarchical approach simplifies the design process by allowing synthetic biologists to focus on one level of complexity at a time, without being overwhelmed by the details of lower levels. For example, a genetic circuit can be designed at the device level using standardized parts, without needing to consider the intricate molecular interactions at the part level. The principle of orthogonality is also crucial in synthetic biology. Orthogonality refers to the ability of synthetic biological components to function independently of the host organism’s native biological processes. This ensures that the introduced synthetic systems do not interfere with the host’s natural functions, thereby reducing the risk of unintended consequences. Achieving orthogonality often involves designing synthetic components that use unique molecular interactions or pathways that are not present in the host organism. Synthetic biology also emphasizes the importance of predictability and reliability in the design and construction of biological systems. This is achieved through the use of mathematical modeling and computational tools to predict the behavior of synthetic biological systems before they are constructed. By simulating the interactions and dynamics of biological components, synthetic biologists can identify potential issues and optimize designs for desired outcomes. This predictive approach reduces the trial-and-error aspect of biological experimentation, making the engineering of biological systems more efficient and reliable. In addition to these principles, synthetic biology relies heavily on the concept of standardization. Standardization involves creating uniform protocols and measurement techniques to ensure that biological parts and systems can be reliably reproduced and shared among researchers. This is essential for the collaborative nature of synthetic biology, as it allows researchers from different backgrounds and institutions to work together effectively. Standardization also facilitates the scaling up of synthetic biological systems for industrial and commercial applications. Overall, the foundational principles of synthetic biology—modularity, abstraction, orthogonality, predictability and standardization—provide a robust framework for the systematic engineering of biological systems. These principles enable synthetic biologists to design and construct novel biological functions with precision and reliability, paving the way for innovative solutions to some of the most pressing challenges in medicine agriculture, and environmental sustainability10-17. Table 1 elucidates the fundamental principles underpinning synthetic biology: Modularity: This means breaking down complex biological systems into smaller, manageable parts. It could be viewed like building with a blocks game, where each block is a piece that can be used to create something bigger.

Abstraction Hierarchies: This involves organizing biological parts into different levels, such as parts, devices, and systems. It’s like organizing a library where books are sorted into sections, shelves and individual books, making it easier to find what is needed.  

Orthogonality: This ensures that synthetic biological parts work independently from the host organism’s natural processes. It’s like adding a new app to your phone that doesn’t interfere with the phone’s existing functions.   

Predictability and reliability: This is about using mathematical models and computer tools to predict how synthetic biological systems will behave. It’s like using a weather forecast to predict the weather, helping scientists design experiments that are more likely to succeed.

Standardization: This involves creating uniform methods and measurements so that biological parts can be reliably reproduced and shared among researchers. It’s like having a standard recipe that anyone can follow to bake the same cake, ensuring consistency and collaboration. Table 2 shows the experiments that highlight the progressive advancements in synthetic biology, showcasing the ability to design and construct organisms with entirely synthetic genomes18-22. Each step builds on previous knowledge, pushing the boundaries of what is possible in creating life from basic biological components.

Science behind synthetic biology

Synthetic biology utilizes the systematic and standardized manipulation of genetic material to generate new biological functions and systems.  A mechanistic understanding of this field requires a thorough examination of molecular biology, biophysics and computational modeling that support these engineered systems.  Central to synthetic biology is the manipulation of DNA, the molecule containing genetic information.  DNA is composed of nucleotides, each consisting of a phosphate group, a sugar molecule and a nitrogenous base. The order of these bases (adenine, thymine, cytosine, and guanine) dictates the genetic instructions. Synthetic biologists employ techniques like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify DNA sequences and DNA sequencing to read these sequences.  DNA manipulation frequently involves restriction enzymes, which cleave DNA at specific sequences and ligases, which connect DNA fragments. This enables the creation of recombinant DNA molecules, which can be introduced into host organisms through processes like transformation, transfection or electroporation. The design of synthetic biological systems frequently uses the concept of genetic circuits, which are analogous to electronic circuits. These circuits comprise promoters, ribosome binding sites, coding sequences and terminators. Promoters are DNA sequences that initiate transcription, the process by which RNA polymerase creates messenger RNA (mRNA) from a DNA template. Ribosome binding sites are sequences that facilitate the binding of ribosomes to mRNA, initiating translation, the process by which proteins are synthesized from mRNA. Coding sequences are the portions of DNA that encode proteins and terminators signal the end of transcription22-32. The behavior of genetic circuits can be modeled using differential equations that describe the rates of transcription, translation and degradation of mRNA and proteins. For example, the rate of change of mRNA concentration ((m)) can be described by the equation:

dtdm=α−βm

The variable α represents the transcription rate, while β represents the mRNA degradation rate.  The rate at which protein concentration (p) changes can be expressed analogously:

dtdp=γm−δp

In these equations, γ represents the translation rate, while δ represents the protein degradation rate.  Numerical solutions to these equations allow for predictions of genetic circuit behavior under varying conditions.  Beyond genetic circuits, synthetic biology also encompasses the engineering of metabolic pathways.  Metabolic pathways are sequential chemical reactions within a cell, each catalyzed by a specific enzyme.  These pathways can be engineered for the production of valuable compounds, including pharmaceuticals, biofuels, and industrial chemicals.  Metabolic pathway design frequently utilizes stoichiometric models, which detail the balance of reactants and products in each reaction.

These models can be represented as systems of linear equations, solvable through techniques like Flux Balance Analysis (FBA).  FBA optimizes metabolite flow within a reaction network to maximize the production of a target compound.  The physical principles underpinning synthetic biology are grounded in thermodynamics and kinetics.  Thermodynamics dictates the stability and equilibrium of biological molecules, whereas kinetics describes the rates of biochemical reactions22-32. The Gibbs free energy (ΔG) of a reaction determines its spontaneity.  A spontaneous reaction requires a negative ΔG. The Gibbs free energy change for a reaction can be calculated using the equation:

ΔG=ΔH−TΔS

where (\Delta H) is the change in enthalpy, (T) is the temperature, and (\Delta S) is the change in entropy. Enzyme kinetics, on the other hand, is described by the Michaelis-Menten equation:

v=Km+[S]Vmax[S]

The equation v = (V_{max}[S])/([S] + K_m) expresses the relationship between reaction rate (v), maximum reaction rate (V_{max}), substrate concentration ([S]) and the Michaelis constant (K_m).  This equation illustrates how the reaction rate is influenced by both the substrate concentration and the enzyme's attraction to the substrate. Computational tools are essential in synthetic biology for designing and analyzing biological systems.  Bioinformatics tools facilitate the analysis of genomic and proteomic data, enabling the identification of genetic elements and predictions of protein structure and function.  Machine learning (ML) algorithms can model the behavior of genetic circuits and metabolic pathways based on empirical data. Computational models allow for simulations of biological system dynamics, enabling synthetic biologists to test hypotheses and refine designs prior to laboratory experimentation. The convergence of synthetic biology with other fields, such as nanotechnology and materials science, has facilitated the creation of innovative applications.  For instance, synthetic biology can engineer bacteria to produce nanomaterials with specific properties, like improved conductivity or biocompatibility.  These nanomaterials have diverse uses, including drug delivery, biosensing and tissue engineering. In pharmaceutical applications, synthetic biology allows for the production of intricate drugs that are challenging to synthesize using conventional chemical methods.For example, the production of artemisinin, an antimalarial drug, has been enhanced using engineered yeast strains.  These strains have been genetically modified to express the enzymes necessary for artemisinin biosynthesis from simple sugars.  Optimizing this pathway involved employing metabolic engineering techniques to balance the flow of intermediate compounds and maximize the final product yield. The advancement of synthetic biology also presents significant ethical and safety considerations.  The release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) into the environment requires careful management to prevent unforeseen ecological consequences.  The possibility of synthetic biology being misused for bioterrorism or the creation of dangerous biological agents necessitates strict regulatory oversight.  Researchers must comply with biosafety and biosecurity guidelines to ensure the responsible and safe application of synthetic biology. In conclusion, synthetic biology is a rapidly advancing field that integrates principles from biology, engineering, and computer science to design and build novel biological systems.  The mechanistic understanding of synthetic biology encompasses DNA manipulation, the design of genetic circuits and metabolic pathways, and the application of physical and computational principles22-38. This interdisciplinary approach enables the development of innovative solutions for a wide range of applications, from pharmaceuticals to nanotechnology, while also necessitating careful consideration of ethical and safety issues.

Using synthetic biology in pharmaceutical applications: A model guide

Synthetic biology is revolutionizing the pharmaceutical industry by providing innovative solutions for drug discovery, development and production. Theoretically, several concepts must be born in mind when aiming to transfer this technology into the industry. This guide outlines the steps involved in leveraging synthetic biology for pharmaceutical applications, focusing on practical and actionable strategies. Before delving into specific applications, it is essential to grasp the foundational principles of synthetic biology, which serve as the starting point for any synthetic biology project. These principles include, as stated earliersome concepts that must be familiar before excusion of new research. Synthetic biology hinges on several core principles. Modularity involves the decomposition of complex biological systems into smaller, manageable parts, simplifying analysis and manipulation. Abstraction hierarchies organize these components into hierarchical levels, enabling a systematic approach to biological complexity. Orthogonality ensures the independent function of synthetic components within the host organism, minimizing unintended interactions and maximizing control. Predictability and reliability are achieved through mathematical modeling and computational tools, allowing for accurate prediction and optimization of system behavior. Standardization of protocols and measurement techniques promotes reproducibility, collaboration, and rapid advancement in the field.By understanding and applying these principles, researchers can effectively design and implement synthetic biology projects, driving innovation in various fields, including medicine, agriculture and environmental science. The first step in applying synthetic biology to pharmaceuticals is identifying specific needs within the industry. These can include drug discovery, production, personalized medicine, vaccine development and disease modeling. Once the needs are identified, the next step is designing synthetic biological systems to address these needs. This involves selecting biological parts, constructing genetic circuits and modeling and simulating the systems. After designing the synthetic systems, the next step is building and testing them in the lab. This includes DNA assembly, transformation, screening and selection and functional testing. Once a functional synthetic system is developed, it needs to be optimized and scaled for industrial use. This involves optimization, fermentation and bioprocessing and purification. Ensuring that the synthetic biology applications comply with regulatory standards is crucial. This includes safety assessments, regulatory approval and quality control. For pharmaceutical applications, clinical trials are essential to validate the efficacy and safety of the new drugs or therapies. This involves preclinical studies, Phase I, II and III trials and Phase IV trials.

After successful clinical trials, the final step is bringing the synthetic biology-based pharmaceutical product to market. This involves manufacturing, distribution and marketing. To illustrate these steps, there are a few case studies that have successfully implemented synthetic biology breakthroughs in pharmaceutical applications. As mentioned earlier, Artemisinin production, CAR-T cell therapy and synthetic vaccines are examples of how synthetic biology has revolutionized the pharmaceutical industry. The future of synthetic biology in pharmaceuticals holds immense potential, with advancements in gene editing, synthetic microbiomes, biosensors and personalized therapies. Synthetic biology offers a powerful toolkit for transforming pharmaceutical applications17,33-41. The integration of modularity, abstraction hierarchies, orthogonality, predictability, and standardization ensures that these synthetic systems are designed and implemented with precision and reliability, paving the way for a new era in medicine.

Leveraging AI and ML in synthetic biology for pharmaceutical applications

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) are transforming synthetic biology, particularly in the pharmaceutical industry. These technologies enhance the design, development and production of new drugs and therapies. The following sectionsoutlineshighlights on steps on how to effectively integrate AI and ML into synthetic biology for pharmaceutical applications42-57.

1. Understanding the Role of AI and ML in synthetic biology

AI and ML can process vast amounts of biological data, identify patterns and make predictions that are beyond human capability. In synthetic biology, these technologies are used to:

2. Data Collection and Preparation

The first step in using AI and ML in synthetic biology is collecting and preparing data:

Data preparation involves cleaning and organizing the data to ensure it is suitable for analysis. This includes removing duplicates, filling in missing values and standardizing formats.

3. Building Predictive Models

Once the data is prepared, the next step is building predictive models using AI and ML:

4. Integrating AI and ML into the DBTL Cycle

The DBTL cycle is a core process in synthetic biology and AI and ML can enhance each stage:

5. Case Study Concept: AI-Driven Drug Discovery

A practical example of AI and ML in synthetic biology is AI-driven drug discovery:

6. Optimizing Metabolic Pathways

In pharmaceutical production, optimizing metabolic pathways in microorganisms is crucial for efficient drug synthesis:

7. Automating Laboratory Processes

Automation is a key benefit of integrating AI and ML into synthetic biology:

8. Ensuring Data Security and Ethical Compliance

With the integration of AI and ML, ensuring data security and ethical compliance is essential:

9. Future Directions

The future of AI and ML in synthetic biology holds immense potential:

AI and ML are powerful tools that can significantly enhance synthetic biology, particularly in pharmaceutical applications. By following the steps outlined in this guide, researchers and companies can harness the potential of these technologies to develop innovative drugs, optimize production processes and automate laboratory workflows42-58. The integration of AI and ML ensures that synthetic biology projects are more efficient, accurate and scalable, paving the way for groundbreaking advancements in medicine.

 

CONCLUSIONS

 

Synthetic biology, a burgeoning field at the intersection of biology, engineering, and computer science, has emerged as a powerful tool for engineering life at the microscopic scale. By systematically manipulating genetic material and applying principles of modularity, abstraction, orthogonality, predictability and standardization, researchers are able to design and construct novel biological systems with unprecedented precision. The integration of advanced computational tools, such as ML and AI, further enhances the capabilities of synthetic biology, enabling the prediction, optimization and automation of complex biological processes. The potential applications of synthetic biology are vast and far-reaching, with significant implications for healthcare, agriculture and environmental sustainability. In the pharmaceutical industry, synthetic biology is revolutionizing drug discovery, development and production. By engineering microorganisms to produce therapeutic compounds, researchers can accelerate the development of novel drugs and reduce production costs.

Additionally, synthetic biology can be used to create personalized medicines tailored to the specific genetic makeup of individual patients. However, the rapid advancement of synthetic biology also raises important ethical considerations. As scientists gain increasing control over the fundamental building blocks of life, it is imperative to carefully consider the potential risks and benefits of this technology. Rigorous ethical guidelines and international cooperation are essential to ensure the responsible and beneficial use of synthetic biology. In the future, synthetic biology is poised to continue its trajectory of innovation, with exciting developments on the horizon. The integration of emerging technologies, such as CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing and synthetic organelles, will further expand the capabilities of this field. By addressing grand challenges, such as climate change, food security and infectious diseases, synthetic biology can play a pivotal role in shaping a sustainable and prosperous future.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 

None to declare.

 

AUTHOR'S CONTRIBUTION

 

Eissa ME: conceived the idea, writing the manuscript, literature survey, formal analysis, critical review. 

 

DATA AVAILABILITY

 

Upon request, the accompanying author can furnish the empirical data used to bolster the findings of the study.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

 

No conflict of interest associated with this work.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Hanczyc MM. Engineering Life: A Review of Synthetic Biology. Artif Life 2020;26(2):260-273.http://doi.org/10.1162/artl_a_00318
  1. Katz L, Chen YY, Gonzalez R, Peterson TC, Zhao H, Baltz RH. Synthetic biology advances and applications in the biotechnology industry: a perspective. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2018; 45(7):449-461.http://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-018-2056-y
  1. Benner SA, Sismour AM. Synthetic biology. Nat Rev Genet 2005; 6(7):533-543. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1637
  2. Cameron DE, Bashor CJ, Collins JJ. A brief history of synthetic biology. Nat Rev Microbiol 2014; 12(5):381-390. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3239
  3. Nielsen J, Keasling JD. Engineering cellular metabolism. Cell 2016;164(6):1185-1197.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.004
  1. Anderson DA, Jones RD, Arkin AP, Weiss R. Principles of synthetic biology: a MOOC for an emerging field. Synth Biol 2019;4(1):ysz010.http://doi.org/10.1093/synbio/ysz010
  1. Endy D. Foundations for engineering biology. Nature 2005; 438(7067):449-453.http://doi.org/10.1038/nature04342
  1. Canton B, Labno A, Endy D. Refinement and standardization of synthetic biological parts and devices. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26(7):787-793.http://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1413
  1. Shetty RP, Endy D, Knight TF. Engineering BioBrick vectors from BioBrick parts. J Biol Eng 2008; 2(1):5.http://doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-2-5
  1. Purnick PE, Weiss R. The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10(6):410-422. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2698
  2. Heinemann M, Panke S. Synthetic biology—putting engineering into biology. Bioinformatics 2006;22(22):2790-2799. http://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl469
  3. Elowitz MB, Leibler S. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 2000; 403(6767):335-338. http://doi.org/10.1038/35002125
  4. Mukherji S, van Oudenaarden A. Synthetic biology: understanding biological design from synthetic circuits. Nat Rev Genet 2009; 10(12):859-871.http://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2697
  1. Kwok R. Five hard truths for synthetic biology. Nature 2010; 463(7279):288-290. http://doi.org/10.1038/463288a
  2. Khalil AS, Collins JJ. Synthetic biology: Applications come of age. Nat Rev Genet 2010; 11(5):367-379.http://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2775
  1. Arkin AP. Setting the standard in synthetic biology. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26(7):771-774.http://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0708-771
  1. Andrianantoandro E, Basu S, Karig DK, Weiss R. Synthetic biology: New engineering rules for an emerging discipline. Mol Syst Biol 2006; 2(1):2006.0028.http://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100073 
  1. Gibson DG, Glass JI, Lartigue C, et al. Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science 2010; 329(5987):52-56.http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190719
  1. Hutchison CA, Chuang RY, Noskov VN, et al. Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome. Science 2016; 351(6280):aad6253. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad6253
  2. Daly AC, Prendergast ME, Hughes AJ, Burdick JA. Bioprinting for the biologist. Cell 2021 Jan 7; 184(1):18-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.002
  3. Rothschild LJ, Averesch NJ, Strychalski EA, et al. Building synthetic cells─ from the technology infrastructure to cellular entities. ACS Synthetic Biology 2024 Mar 26;13(4):974-97.http://DOI:10.1021/acssynbio.3c00724
  1. Richardson SM, Mitchell LA, Stracquadanio G, et al. Design of a synthetic yeast genome. Science 2017; 355(6329):1040-1044. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf4557
  2. Chen YY, Galloway KE, Smolke CD. Synthetic biology: advancing biological frontiers by building synthetic systems. Genome Biol 2012; 13(2):240.http://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-2-240
  1. Radde NE, Hütt MT. The Physics behind Systems Biology. EPJ Nonlinear Biomed Phys 2016;4:7.http://doi.org/10.1140/epjnbp/s40366-016-0034-8
  1. Clancy S, Brown W. Translation: DNA to mRNA to Protein. Nature Education 2008; 1(1):101.http://doi.org/10.1038/scitable.2008.1.1.101
  1. Marchisio MA, Stelling J. Automatic Design of Digital Synthetic Gene Circuits. PLoS Comput Biol 2011; 7(2):e1001083. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001083
  2. Jiang S, Ma Y, Dai J. Synthetic yeast genome project and beyond. The Innovation Life 2024 Mar 8; 2(1):100059. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2024.100059
  3. Watson JD, Crick FH. Molecular structure of nucleic acids: a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 1953; 171(4356):737-738.http://doi.org/10.1038/171737a0
  1. Mullis K, Faloona F. Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol 1987; 155:335-350.http://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)55023-6
  1. Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001. http://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot032391
  2. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th Garland Science; 2002. http://doi.org/10.1201/9780203833445
  3. Lodish H, Berk A, Kaiser CA, Krieger M, Bretscher A, Ploegh H, Amon A, Scott MP. Molecular Cell Biology. 8th W.H. Freeman; 2016.
  4. David F, Davis AM, Gossing M, Hayes MA, Romero E, Scott LH, Wigglesworth MJ. A perspective on synthetic biology in drug discovery and development—current impact and future opportunities. SLAS Discov 2021;26(5):581-603. http://doi.org/10.1177/24725552211000669
  5. Feng Y, Su C, Mao G, Sun B, Cai Y, Dai J, Ma Y. When synthetic biology meets medicine. Life Med 2024; 3(1):lnae010. http://doi.org/10.1093/lifemedi/lnae010
  6. Abil Z, Xiong X, Zhao H. Synthetic biology for therapeutic applications. Mol Pharm. 2015; 12(8):3108-3119. http://doi.org/10.1021/mp500392q
  7. Heinemann M, Panke S. Synthetic biology—putting engineering into biology. Bioinformatics 2006 Nov 15; 22(22):2790-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl469
  8. Clubb JD, Gao TA, Chen YY. Synthetic biology in the engineering of CAR-T and CAR-NK cell therapies: facts and hopes. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29(7):1390-1402. http://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1491
  9. Oguri H. Synthesis and structural diversification of artemisinins towards the generation of potent anti-malarial agents. Chem Lett. 2021; 50(5):924-937.http://doi.org/10.1246/cl.200920
  1. Du YH, Wang MY, Yang LH, Tong LL, Guo DS, Ji XJ. Optimization and scale-up of fermentation processes driven by models. Bioeng 2022; 9(9):473.http://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9090473
  1. Carter SR, Rodemeyer M, Garfinkel MS, Friedman RM. Synthetic biology and the U.S. biotechnology regulatory system: challenges and options. J Craig Venter Institute 2014. https://doi.org/10.2172/1169537
  2. Fountzilas E, Tsimberidou AM, Vo HH, Kurzrock R. Clinical trial design in the era of precision medicine. Genome Med. 2022;14(1):101.http://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01102-1
  1. Abbas MKG, Rassam A, Karamshahi F, Abunora R, Abouseada M. The Role of AI in Drug Discovery. Chem Bio Chem 2024; 25(10):816.http://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202300816
  1. Mak KK, Wong YH, Pichika MR. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug discovery and evaluation: safety and pharmacokinetic assays 2024 Oct 22:1461-98.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35529-5_92
  1. Qureshi R, Irfan M, Gondal TM, et al. AI in drug discovery and its clinical relevance. Heliyon 2023 Jul 1;9(7). http://doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17575
  2. Serrano DR, Luciano FC, Anaya BJ, et al. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Applications in Drug Discovery and Drug Delivery: Revolutionizing Personalized Medicine. Pharmaceutics 2024; 16(10):1328.http://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16101328
  1. Qiu X, Li H, Ver Steeg G, Godzik A. Advances in AI for protein structure prediction: Implications for cancer drug discovery and development. Biomolecules 2024; 14(3):339. http://doi.org/10.3390/biom14030339
  2. Pérez de la Lastra JM, Wardell SJT, Pal T, et al. From data to decisions: leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning in combating antimicrobial resistance – A comprehensive review. J Med Syst 2024; 48(71).http://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-02089-5
  1. Sabzevari M, Szedmak S, Penttilä M, et al. Strain design optimization using reinforcement learning. PLoS Comput Biol 2022;18(6):e1010177.http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010177
  1. Merzbacher C, Oyarzún DA. Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in dynamic pathway engineering. Biochem Soc Trans 2023;51(5):1871-1879. http://doi.org/10.1042/BST20221542
  2. Van Lent P, Schmitz J, Abeel T. Simulated Design-Build-Test-Learn Cycles for Consistent Comparison of Machine Learning Methods in Metabolic Engineering. ACS Synth Biol 2024;3(1):186.http://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.3c00186
  1. Matzko R, Konur S. Technologies for design-build-test-learn automation and computational modelling across the synthetic biology workflow: a review. Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinform 2024;13(22).http://doi.org/10.1007/s13721-024-00455-4
  1. Wenteler A, Cabrera CP, Wei W, Neduva V, Barnes MR. AI approaches for the discovery and validation of drug targets. Cambridge Prisms: Precision Medicine 2024;2:e7. http://doi.org/10.1017/pcm.2024.4
  2. Callaway E. Chemistry Nobel goes to developers of AlphaFold AI that predicts protein structures. Nature. 2024;586(7829):214-217.http://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-03214-7
  1. Bandiera L, Gomez-Cabeza D, Gilman J, Balsa-Canto E, Menolascina F. Optimally designed model selection for synthetic biology. ACS Synthetic Biology 2020 Nov 5; 9(11):3134-44.https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00393
  1. Volk MJ, Lourentzou I, Mishra S, Vo LT, Zhai C, Zhao H. Biosystems design by machine learning. ACS synthetic biology 2020 Jun 2; 9(7):1514-33.https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00129
  1. Smith AM, Walsh JR, Long J, et al. Standard machine learning approaches outperform deep representation learning on phenotype prediction from transcriptomics data. BMC Bioinformatics 2020; 21:119.http://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-020-3427-8
  1. Quazi S. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in precision and genomic medicine. Med Oncol 2022; 39(120). http://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-022-01711-1
  2. Anahtar MN, Yang JH, Kanjilal S. Applications of machine learning to the problem of antimicrobial resistance: An emerging model for translational research. J Clin Microbiol 2021; 59(7).http://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01260-20