EVALUATION OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSE TO POLIO VACCINE IN MALNOURISHED CHILDREN IN SANA'A CITY

Mogahid Y. Nassar1,2, *Hassan A. Al-Shamahy3, Ansam Mansor Mohammed AL-Barq3

1Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Science and Technology, Sana'a, Yemen.

2Laboratory Department, University of Science and Technology Hospital, Sana’a, Yemen.

3Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v3i2.137

ABSTRACT

This study was made to evaluate the immune response to polio virus vaccine among PEM children by measuring the level of circulating Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against polio virus (IgG-PV) after immunization with the primary series of POV, and determining the coverage rate of universal childhood vaccine for polio virus. A cross-sectional laboratory study was conducted in Department of Medical Microbiology and Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, and Al-Sabeen University Hospital, Sana’a University. A total of 279 PEM children were selected and investigated for universal childhood vaccination coverage rate for polio vaccine. Blood samples were collected from all, then tested for levels of IgG-PV by ELISA method. For assessment IgG-PV levels more than 10 units/ml were considered protected against polio virus infection. The coverage rate of polio virus vaccine for first year vaccine was 96.8%; and 91.1% of vaccinated PEM children responded to the vaccine with mean level of 46.2 U/ml. A statistically significant difference was observed with respect to sero-protective IgG-PV between males and females (85.7% and 94.1% respectively, p=0.002); and older children (>37 months) (97.7%). We conclude that a small proportion of malnourished vaccinated children with a normal immune status were not serologically immune to polio virus infection, and remain to be reconsidered for either revaccination or booster doses due to lack of or inadequate response. PEM group gave slightly reduced response to OPV hence there is need to give this group IPV (injectable polio vaccine) along with OPV and different micro-nutrition deficiencies like Zinc and iron.

Keywords: Children, malnutrition,  PEM, polio vaccine, POV, Sana'a city, Yemen.

INTRODUCTION

Globally Malnutrition is the most important cause for failure of all vaccination1,2. Consistent with Independent Monitoring Board of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative, Tenth Report 2014 on 28th of October 2014, globally 257 polio cases were reported in three polio endemic countries, of which 220, wild polio cases were reported from Pakistan.2,3,4  About 165 million children are universally, chronically malnourished. This preventable state has affected one in every four children. Malnutrition cause 2.3 million children deaths per year, an average of one death per every 15 seconds.5 According to WHO majority of expected malnourished children live in developing countries. Less than 30% of them are under the age of five years and half of them are suffering from PEM1,2.

The report of MHP Yemen, and UNICEF shows the PEM is very high in Yemen among children (50%) this Malnutrition might be one of  the main difficulty for polio eradication among under five years old children in Yemen6. In its 41st meeting in 1988, World Health Assembly approved a declaration according to which “OPV is exclusively used worldwide for polio eradication for some reasons. It is cheaper than Intramuscular polio Vaccine (IPV) and can be easily orally administered”2.  However, worldwide, the oral vaccine doesn’t effectively develop immunity against polio, particularly in malnourished children7. Some data from WHO has also highlighted that malnutrition hinders the battle against polio because OPV produces four times less immunity in malnourished children as compared to well-nourished. Since 50% of under-five children are malnourished in Yemen, it is very difficult to eradicate polio from Yemen6. Therefore, our priority should be focused on preventing malnutrition in this group of population. This study was made to evaluate the immune response to polio virus vaccine among PEM children by measuring the level of circulating Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against polio virus (IgG-PV) after immunization with the primary series of POV, and determining the coverage rate of universal childhood vaccine for polio virus.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Ethical Consideration

Ethical clearance for the study was taken from the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Research Review Committee. A written permission was also taken from the head of the pediatric department of the Al-Sabian Hospital, Sana'a city, Yemen. Informed Consent was taken from the parents and guardians of all selected children before the questionnaire was filled in and before the blood samples were collected.

Survey procedure and Laboratory Analysis

Demographic data and other relevant information of each participant were obtained through a questionnaire. Then, about 4 ml of blood was aseptically drawn by venipuncture after swabbing the area of interest for sample collection with alcohol. The serum was then separated from the blood by allowing clotting and centrifuging. Finally, the serum samples were labeled and stored at -20ºC until processed. The polio IgG antibody ELISA test kit, manufactured and described by DEMEDITEC Diagnostic GmbH Germany, was used for the detection of specific IgG antibodies against polio in the serum of children with strict adherence to the manufacturer’s instruction manual.

Study setting

The study was conducted at the pediatric department of the Al-Sabian Hospital, Sana'a city, Yemen. The Hospital was selected because it is the only teaching hospitals in Sana'a city provides health services to malnutrition children.

Study Population

Children between the age of 6 months to 59 months who attended the pediatric patient Department (PD) with PEM. These subjects of the study were taken from 17th of March, 2017 to 17th of September 2017 as the study population. It was ensured that they must have received first year oral polio vaccine doses and fulfill the eligibility criteria of study. A total of 279 blood samples were collected.

Sample size

The sample size was calculated by using sample size determination in health studies by WHO with 95% confidence interval and 5% level of significance with acceptable margin of error equal to 6% with PEM population in Yemen at least equal to 500 000 children. The proportions of antibodies production among malnourished subjects (“Evaluation of the response to vaccination against poliomyelitis and measles in malnourished children8 was 59.5% in malnutrition children. The sample size was calculated to be 257 subjects. In such a small sample size, the chance of type 1 and type 2 errors are increased. To reduce these errors in the study, we increased the sample size to 279 subjects.

RESULTS

The study included 270 malnourished children (126 males and 153 females). Most of our children patients were in age group 13-24 months in which they count 36.9%, followed by age group 3-12 months, in which the rate was 31.2% (Table 1). The non-protective of polio-antibodies IgG rate in our children patients was 8.6%, while the protective rate of polio-antibodies IgG in them was 91.4% (table 2). There was 8.6% of malnourished children had 2-9.9IU/ml Polio-virus IgG antibodies (susceptibility to polio infection), 28.3% of them had 11-30IU/ml (deprived protective level, and need urgent booster vaccine),  42.7% of malnourished children had 31-50IU/ml (needy protective level which might faint in short time, and need  booster vaccine), 10.4% of malnourished children had 51-70IU/ml Polio-virus IgG antibodies (good health protective level) and  10% of malnourished children had ≥ 71 IU/ml polio-virus IgG antibodies (fabulous protective level) (Table 3). The susceptibility rate to polio virus infection among males was 14.3%, higher than that of females 3.9%, with OR of susceptibility to poliovirus for male equal to 4.1 times than female (p=0.002). As regard to the age, the susceptibility rates were increase in younger age groups (Table 4). Table 5 shows the associated odds ratio of susceptibility to polio virus infection with history of polio vaccine of malnourished children. There was high susceptibility rate to polio infection  with children delivery in hospital (9.1%), and history of first month illness (9.5%), and in children had mixed feeding (33.3%), but no statistical significance was observed (Table 6).

DISCUSSION

Yemen introduced universal immunization against Polio virus infection for infants (POV) in early 70s of the last century, but feedback on the coverage rate of vaccinations and their efficacy in the community have been ignored for a long period. In addition, information on the prevalence and risk determinants of polio virus infection and on vaccination coverage rate and immune status against polio virus infection among children particularly malnourished children in Yemen has been inadequate or non-existent. Consequently, this study has been carried out to help our understanding of some of these questions. In addition, seroprevalence studies provide important data on act of immunization programs, susceptible groups and populations at-risk of future outbreaks. Identifying risk factors that affect seroconversion of the oral polio vaccine (OPV) will enable the polio eradication initiatives to increase seroprevalence. This study demonstrates the first hospital-based study aiming to determine the immune status of malnourished children in Sana'a city against polio virus. A total of 279 serum samples from malnourished children in Sana'a city were collected and analyzed in this study for polio-specific IgG antibodies, there was 91.4% of children had protective of polio-antibodies IgG against polio virus infection, while 8.6% of tested children had non protective level of polio-antibodies IgG against polio virus infection, with other words they are susceptible and under risk of polio virus infections.  The high seroprevalence of 91.1% recorded in this study among malnourished children in Sana'a city indicates children have effectively responded to the vaccine being used in the ongoing polio eradication initiative in spite of malnourished. These findings are similar with United States study in which it was reported that 90% of healthy school age children, adolescent and young adults had detectable antibodies to Poliovirus in spite of their nourished.9 However, present seroprevalence of 91.1% is higher than the findings of Egypt by El-Sayed et al.10, (37.8%) and Morocco  by Yousuf et al8. (21.4%), among malnourished children groups.

The current  study seroprevalence of protective IgG antibodies for polio virus  was slightly higher (94.1%) in females compared to males (85.7%), this result is different from study  by Iliyasu et al.11 in Nigeria, but similar to Donbraye et a12l. study in Nigeria where females had higher antibody titers for all the three serotypes.  Also our result is similar to Baba et al13. in India and to Chinese study by Wang et al14. also. Sex differential non-specific effects of vaccines are common in developing countries with negative non-specific effects (NSE) of inactivated vaccines more common in girls than boys in some countries, but with no differences in high income countries16,17 . Though the general pattern is both negative and positive NSE are stronger in females18, a randomized controlled trial in Guinea-Bissau negated the hypothesis that mortality rates in boys would be lower if they had not received OPV19. The reasons why OPV uptake is slightly higher for females in our study area are unknown. Though factors such as age, gender and urban setting have no remedial solution from a public health perspective, this study indicates that response may be affected by factors that are not amenable to modification. This is important for the understanding of oral vaccine performance in low-income countries.  When we considered age groups, there was trend toward increased rate of positive protective levels of IgG antibodies against polio virus in the current study in which the higher seropositivity rate was in the older age group ( ≥ 37 months age group) (97.7%) and the lowest protective rate was 87.4% in 6-12 months age group (Table 4). This similar to findings in previous studies in Vellore district of Tamil Nadu - Sri Lanka  in which lower rate of protective antibodies rate was found in children under one years of age20. This could be due to a more mature immune system or to receipt of OPV doses that are not recorded in the vaccination history taken for the child. When we study the associated odds ratio of susceptibility to polio virus infection with history of polio vaccine among malnourished children in Sana'a city Yemen, there was increased rate of susceptibility for polio virus in our study among children whom not had national camping booster polio vaccine in which the rate of susceptibility was 14.6%, while the rate of susceptibility among children whom had national camping booster polio vaccine was 5.5% only (Table 5). Our result is similar to previously reported studies in which increasing the number of OPV doses received by children, decreasing the susceptibility rate for polio virus; and increase the polio-seroconversion rates among children8,11,21.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that a small proportion of malnourished vaccinated children with a normal immune status were not serologically immune to polio virus infection, and remain to be reconsidered for either revaccination or booster doses due to lack of or inadequate response; more information, however, needs to be gathered first on the occurrence of clinical/subclinical poliomyelitis cases (morbidity and mortality) and the overall morbidity and mortality following polio vaccination. Also the rates of vaccine coverage for the routine immunization schedule of childhood vaccines were good.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Authors acknowledge the financial support of Sana'a University, Yemen.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

"No conflict of interest associated with this work”.

REFERENCES

  1. Polio vaccines: WHO position paper, March, 2016. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2016; 91 (12): 145–168.
  2.  "Poliomyelitis".  World Health Organization. Archivedfrom the original on 18 April 2017.
  3. Caidi H, Bennis IF, Mouan N, El Aouad R. Evaluation of the response to vaccination against poliomyelitis and measles in malnourished children in Morocco. East Mediterr Health J. 2004; 10(4-5):474–481.
  4. World Health Organization: National Surveillance Bulletin Pakistan. 2011
  5. Jack Dean. “165 million children malnourished worldwide”. World Socialist Web Site Published by the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI), 1 June; 2013.
  6. MHP (Ministary of Health and Population, Sana', Yemen). National Surveillance Health report of Yemen. 2017.
  7. Sack DA, Qadri F, Svennerholm AM. Determinants of responses t oral vaccines in developing countries. Ann Nestlé (Engl Ed) 2008; 66(2):71–79.
  8. Yousuf A,   Shah SA,  Jaffery IA et al. Seroprevalence rate of Poliovirus antibodies among the Healthy and Protein Energy Malnutrition children. Pak J Med Sci. 2015; 31(2):403-407.
  9. Kelley PW, Petruccelli BP, Stehr-Green P, Manson CJ. The susceptibility of young adult Americans to vaccine-preventable infections, natural sero-survey of US army recruits. J Am Med Assoc. 1991; 266(19):2724–2729.
  10. El-Sayed N, Al-Jorf S, Hennessey KA, Salama M, Watkins MA, Abdelwahab JA, et al. Survey of poliovirus antibodies during the final stage of polio eradication in Egypt. Vaccine. 2007; 25(27):5062–5070.
  11. Iliyasu Z, Nwaze E, Verma H, Mustapha AO, Weldegebriel G, Gasasira A. Survey of poliovirus antibodies in Kano. Northern Nigeria. Vaccine. 2014; 32(12):1414-1420. 
  12. Donbraye E, Adewumi MO, Odaibo GN, Bakarey AS, Opaleye OO, Olaleye DO. Evaluation of immunity against poliovirus serotypes among children in Riverine areas of Delta State, Nigeria. African J Clin Exp Microbiol. 2011; 12(2):72–75.
  13. Baba MM, Haruna BA, Ogunmola O, Ambe JP, Shidali NN, Oderinde B. A survey for neutralizing antibodies to the three types of poliovirus among children in Maiduguri. Nigeria. J Med Virol. 2012; 84(4):691–696. 
  14. Wang H, Cui H, Ding Z, Ba P, Zhu S, Wen N. Seroprevalence of anti-polio antibodies among children <15 years of age in border provinces in China. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013; 20(7):1070–1075. 
  15. Aaby P, Jensen H, Gomes J, Fernandes M, Lisse IM. The introduction of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine and child mortality in rural Guinea-Bissau: an observational study. Int J Epidemiol. 2004; 33(2):374-380.
  16. Aaby P, Jensen H, Walraven G. Age-specific changes in the female-male mortality ratio related to the pattern of vaccinations: an observational study from rural Gambia. Vaccine. 2006; 24(22):4701–4708.
  17. Schurink-Van’t, Klooster TM, Knol MJ, De Melker HE, Van der Sande MA. Gender-specific mortality in DTP-IPV- and MMR+/-Men C-eligible age groups to determine possible sex-differential effects of vaccination: an observational study. BMC Infect Dis. 2015; 15:148. 
  18. Flanagan KL, Van Crevel R, Curtis N, Shann F, Levy O, Optimmunize N. Heterologous (“nonspecific”) and sex-differential effects of vaccines: epidemiology, clinical trials, and emerging immunologic mechanisms. Clin Infect Dis. 2013; 57(2):283–289. 
  19. Lund N, Andersen A, Hansen AS, Jepsen FS, Barbosa A, Biering-Sorensen S. The effect of oral polio vaccine at birth on infant mortality: a randomized trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2015; 61(10):1504–1511.
  20. Gamage D, Palihawadana P, Mach O, Weldon WC, Oberste SM, Sutter RW. Achieving high seroprevalence against polioviruses in Sri Lanka-Results from a serological survey, 2014. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2015; 5(4 Suppl. 1):S67–S71.
  21. Staat MA, Stadler LP, Donauer S, Trehan I, Rice M, Salisbury S. Serologic testing to verify the immune status of internationally adopted children against vaccine preventable diseases. Vaccine. 2010; 28(50):7947–7955. 

  

Table 1: The age and sex distribution of malnourished children, whom tested for immune status against polio virus, Sana'a city, Yemen

Age groups

Male

Female

Total

No

%

No

%

No

%

6 -12 months

42

33.3

45

29.4

87

31.2

13-24 months

48

38.1

55

35.9

103

36.9

25-36 months

18

14.3

27

17.6

45

16.1

≥ 37 months

18

14.3

26

17

44

15.8

Total

126

45.2

153

54.8

279

100

 

Table 2: The immune status of malnourished children against polio virus, Sana'a city, Yemen

Immune status

Number

percentage

P V

Non-protective level of polio-antibodies IgG (≤9.9 IU/ml)

24

8.6

 

 

< 0.05

Protective level of polio-antibodies IgG

(≥ 10 IU/ml)

255

91.4

Total

279

100

 

 

Table 3: The interpretations of the poliomyelitis virus IgG antibodies level among malnourished children, Sana'a city, Yemen

Polio-virus IgG antibodies IU/ml

Number

Percentage

Interpretations'

2 - 9.9 IU/ml

24

8.6

Susceptible to polio infection

11- 30. IU/ml

79

28.3

deprived protective level, need urgent booster vaccine

31- 50 IU/ml

119

42.7

needy Protective level which might faint in short time, need  booster vaccine

51 - 70 IU/ml

29

10.4

in good health protective level

≥ 71  IU/ml

28

10

fabulous protective level

 

Table 4: The frequency and associated odds ratio of susceptibility to polio virus infection with different sexes and age groups of malnourished children in Sana'a city Yemen.

Characters

Non-protective level

N=24

No                     %

OR

CI

χ 2

PV

Sex:

Male n=126

 

18

 

14.3

 

4.1

1.6-10.6

9.4

0.002

Female n=153

6

3.9

0.24

0.1-0.6

9.4

0.002

Age groups

6-12 m n=87

 

11

 

12.6

 

2

 

0.9-4.6

 

2.6

 

0.1

13-24 m n=103

9

8.7

1

0.4-2.4

0.004

0.95

25-36 m n=45

3

6.7

0.7

0.2-2.5

0.25

0.61

≥ 37 m n=44

1

2.3

0.21

0.02-1.6

2.66

0.102

Total

24

8.6

-

-

-

-

OR          Odds ratio >1 (at risk)

CI           Confidence intervals

χ 2         Chi-square ≥3.9 (significant)

p             Probability value ≤0.05 (significant)

 

Table 5: The associated odds ratio of susceptibility to polio virus infection with history of polio vaccine of malnourished children in Sana'a city Yemen.

Characters

Non-protective level

(N=24)

No                     %

OR

CI

χ 2

PV

First year vaccine

Yes n=270

 

24

 

8.9

Undefined

0.87

0.34

No n=9

0

0

Undefined

0.87

0.34

Booster dose

Yes n=243

 

21

 

8.6

 

1.04

 

0.29-3.6

 

0.04

 

0.95

No n=36

3

8.3

0.96

0.27-3.4

0.4

0.95

National camping booster dose

Yes n=183

 

10

 

5.5

 

0.49

 

0.21-1.13

 

6.8

 

0.01

No n=96

14

14.6

2.8

1.2-6.6

6.8

0.01

OR          Odds ratio >1 (at risk)

CI           Confidence intervals

χ 2         Chi-square ≥3.9 (significant)

p             Probability value ≤0.05 (significant)

 

Table 6: The associated odds ratio of susceptibility to polio virus infection with site of delivery, history of illness during first month of life, and type of feeding of malnourished children in Sana'a city Yemen.

Characters

Non-protective level

N=24

No                     %

OR

CI

χ 2

PV

Site of delivery

Hospital n=165

 

15

 

9.1

1.2

0.49-2.7

0.12

0.72

House n=114

9

7.9

0.85

0.36-2.1

0.12

0.72

History of first month illness

Yes n=158

 

15

 

9.5

 

1.4

 

0.6-3

 

0.36

 

0.54

No n=121

9

7.4

0.7

0.3-1.8

0.56

0.54

Type of feeding

Mother feeding n=195

 

15

 

7.7

0.7

0.3-1.6

0.18

0.40

Bottle feeding n=75

6

8

0.89

0.34-2.3

0.05

0.82

Mixed n=9

3

33.3

5.9

1.4-25.4

7.2

0.007

OR-  Odds ratio >1 (at risk)

CI- Confidence intervals

χ 2- Chi-square ≥3.9 (significant)

p- Probability value ≤0.05 (significant)