PHYTOCHEMICAL SCREENING AND IN VITRO ANTIOXIDANT AND

ANTI-DIABETIC POTENTIALS OF PERSEA AMERICANA MILL. (LAURACEAE) FRUIT EXTRACT

Mahadeva Rao US

School of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), 20400 Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v3i5.200

ABSTRACT

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder characterized by insulin resistance and pancreatic β-cell dysfunction and the management of blood glucose level is an important strategy in the control of the disease and complications associated with it. Therefore, components that cause uptake of glucose from the bloodstream and inhibitors of carbohydrate hydrolyzing enzymes can be useful in treatment of DM and medicinal plants are often used to achieve this aim. Avocado fruit is rich in phytochemicals necessary for treatment of DM. The purpose of this study was to investigate the inhibitory effect of Persea americana fruit extracts on α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes. The percentage yield, phytochemical screening (both qualitative and quantitative), in vitro antioxidant and anti-diabetic assays, and kinetic studies were performed with different solvent extracts of Avocado fruit pulp. Results: Avocado had great and promising potential as pharmaceutical agent, particularly to be developed as anti-diabetic through the inhibition of α-glucosidase and α- amylase enzymes.  In vitro studies of the antioxidant activity of the fruit extract gavean evidence and strong biochemical rationale of their therapeutic potential. The fruit extract of P. americana may play an important role in the development of nutraceuticals and also in the management of oxidative stress induced DM.

Keywords: α-amylase, α-glucosidase, antioxidant, glucose,  nutraceuticals, phytochemical.

INTRODUCTION

Medicinal plant is an important part of traditional health care system and a veritable health care source for the vast majority of the world population. It was estimated that 70-80% of people worldwide use herb for management of mild to moderate illnesses1-5. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an endocrine disorder resulting in obstinate elevation of blood glucose under both fasting and postprandial conditions resulting in micro and macro vascular complications6. The prevalence of diabetes is increasing globally and is prophesied to increase by twofold from 150 million in the year 2000 to 300 million by the year 20307. The uncharacteristic regulation of glucose metabolism that results from a malfunctioning/ scarce insulin secretion is the key pathogenic event in DM.

Currently available drugs for hyperglycemia exhibit adverse side effects on prolonged use. Hence the exploration for novel therapeutic drugs continues. Recent focus has been made towards "functional food", a natural source food purported to have a beneficial health effect for the successful treatment of various ailments especially life style diseases like diabetes. The Avocado (Persea americana Mill.), unflatteringly known in the past as alligator pear, midshipman's butter and vegetable butter. It has traditionally been used due to its antibacterial, antifungal, hypotensive, anti-inflammatory, and immune-enhancing effects8,9. Furthermore, Avocado juice made from ripe fruit was very popular due to its numerous health benefits. Because of the limited number of reports on the fruits of Avocado available in the literature, it was deemed sensible and justified to systematically investigate the fruits of this plant10,11.MThis present study seeks to validate the folkloric use of Avocado fruit extract (AFE) in the management of DM and several oxidative stress induced diseases. The study also confined the kinetics of α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory potentials of AFE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant collection, preparation and extraction.

Fresh fruits of P. americana were selectively collected and authenticated in the Tepi Agricultural Research Center, Tepi and the same was authenticated in department of biology, Mizan Tepi University, Ethiopia. (Vide voucher No. MTU-ETARC 102/08/02). The peel was peeled off and the edible part was chopped into thin pieces, dried at 50-600C, and ground into powder. Known amount of dried amount was exhaustedly extracted by the process of maceration in an aspirator using various solvents as menstruum. AFE with different extracting solvents (ethanol, 50%hydro-ethanol (v/v), decoction (a concentrated liquor resulting from heating or boiling with water) and aqueous) were concentrated under reduced pressure by rotary evaporator to obtain respective thick syrup mass, and stored at 40C. Working concentration of the extract was made in non-pyrogenic distilled water before use in the experiments.

Chemicals and reagents

Porcine pancreatic α-amylase, rat intestinal α- glucosidase, 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl, gallic acid, acarbose and p-nitrophenyl-glucopyranoside were products of Sigma-Adrich, South Africa. Other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade and the water used was glass distilled.

Measurement of percentage yield

The percentage yield of the extract was calculated as-

Where a = weight of sample; b = weight of beaker and c= weight of beaker + sample.       

Phytochemical Screening

  1. Qualitative Phytochemical screening

Using described procedure12, the AFE was subjected to qualitative phytochemical screening with different extracting solvents.

  1. Quantitative Phytochemical Analysis
  2. Assessment of Total Phenolic Content (TPC)

The quantification of TPCwith different solvents of AFE was carried out using the prescribed procedure reported by Wolfe K et al., using Folin Ciocalteu reagent13.  Gallic acid was used as standard. TPC was expressed as mg/g gallic acid equivalent using the equation obtained from a calibration curve of gallic acid.

  1. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content (TFC)

The TFC with different solvents’ extracts were determined using the method employed by Swanny14. TFC was calculated as quercetin (mg/g) equivalent using the equation obtained from a calibration curve of quercetin.

In vitro Antioxidant Assays

All experiments were conducted in triplicates and all the negative control (blank) was prepared using the same procedure replacing the AFE with distilled water.The free radical scavenging activity of the AFE were evaluated with various solvents based on its scavenging activities on the stable 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical according to the method described by Braca A et al15. Determination hydroxyl radical scavenging potential of AFE with various solvents to prevent Fe2+/H2O2 induced decomposition of deoxyribose was carried out using the modified method of Mathew and Abraham16. Determination of superoxide anion radical scavenging potential of AFE with various solvents were achieved according to the method employed by Liu and Chang17. The chelating of Fe2+ by AFE with various solvents was estimated as described by Dinis et al.18. Ferric ions reducing power of the with various solvents’ extracts and standards were determined according to the method adopted by Müller et al19. The ability of AFE to scavenge 2, 2-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) cation chromophore obtained from the oxidation of ABTS solution and potassium persulphate with various solvents was determined according to the method of Re et al20. To these above said antioxidant assays, the percentage inhibitory / scavenging activity of the AFE / standard was calculated using following equation-

Where A0 is the absorbance of the control, and A1 is the absorbance of the AFE / standard. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value were calculated from the linear regression equation using following equation-

y = m x + c,

Where y is the percentage activity and equals 50, m is the slope, c is the intercept and x is the IC50 value.

In vitro Anti-diabetic Assays

The α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory assays were carried out using the procedure of Apostolidis E et al21. The 50% inhibition of enzyme activity (IC50) of these enzymes was expressed as % inhibition using the expression:

Where Acontrol and AAFE are the absorbance’s of the control and AFE respectively. Concentrations of AFE /standard resulting in 50% inhibition of enzyme activity (IC50) were determined graphically using the linear regression equation-

y = mx + c

Where y is the percentage activity and equals 50, m is the slope, c is the intercept and x is the IC50 value.

Kinetic Studies

The kinetics on inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase activity by AFE with various solvents was conducted using modified methods of Ali et al.22 and Nagmoti and Juvekar23 respectively. The amount of reducing sugars released was determined spectrophotometrically using maltose standard curve for α-amylase and p-nitrophenol standard curve for α-glucosidase. A double reciprocal (Lineweaver–Burk) plot (1/v versus 1/[S]) where v is reaction velocity and [S] is substrate concentration was plotted to determine the mode of inhibition. Thus, reaction rates (v) were calculated and double reciprocal plots of enzyme kinetics Km and Vmax values were also calculated from Lineweaver-Burkplot (1/v versus 1/[S])24.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using a Graph Pad Prism 5 statistical package (Graph Pad Software, San Diego, MA, USA). Data were expressed as means of replicate determinations±SD, for all assays and was subjected to one-way analysis of variance (and nonparametric) followed by Bonferroni: compare all pair of column. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The percentage yield of AFE with different extracting solvents is shared out in Table 1.

Phytochemicals (PC)

The qualitative analyses of the AFE with different extracting solvents are presented in Table 2. Phenols, alkaloid, tannins and triterpenes were detected at varying degree in all the tested extracts while flavonoid was found in trace amount in all solvent extracts besides anthraquinone and phytosterol were found in trace amount in the ethanol and 50% hydro-ethanol extracts. The results of the quantitative phytochemical screening (TFC and TPC) of AFE with different extracting solvents are depicted in Table 3.

Antioxidant activity

The in vitro antioxidant potentials of the AFE with different extracting solvents are shown in Figures 1-6. The extracts scavenged/inhibited/chelated the generated radicals/ions/metals in all assays were evaluated. Ethanolic extracts showed better capability to scavenge DPPH and hydroxyl radicals in a dose dependent manner (0.125-1.00 mg/mL) (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Its corresponding IC50 value is 0.52 and 0.59 µg/mL which is lower and significantly different (p<0.05) from the standard (silymarin) IC50: 1.09 and 1.12 µg/mL as seen in Table 4.

However, hydro-ethanol showed remarkable capability in scavenging superoxide anion radical (Figure 3), its IC50 value is 0.49 µg/mL which is comparable to silymarin with IC50 value 1.12 µg/mL. AFE also showed significant metal chelating potential against ferrous ion (figure 4) and the respective IC50 value when compared with the standard (citrate) is presented in Table 4. The reducing power (Figure 5) and ABTS cation scavenging capability (Figure 6) of the extracts competed well with silymarin in a dose dependent manner (0.125- 1 µg/mL) with the highest dose of 1µg/mL showing the best activity (Table 4).

In vitro anti-diabetic assays

The inhibitory potentials of AFE on both α- amylase and α- glucosidase enzymes is dose dependent (0.125-1 µg/mL), and the percentage inhibition is presented in Figure 7 and Figure 8 respectively. Ethanolic extract has the lowest IC50 (0.15 µg/mL) which is significantly different (p<0.05) from all other extracts and acarbose (Table 5). Ethanol and decoction extracts show milder inhibition of α-amylase with their respective IC50 value of 0.57 and 0.62 µg/mL which is higher and significantly different (p< 0.05) from acarbose and hydro-ethanol (IC50:0.47 and 0.42 µg/mL) respectively. Lineweaver-Burk plot of ethanolic extract of Avocado fruit eliciting competitive and uncompetitive inhibition on α-amylase (Figure 9) and α-glucosidase activity (Figure 10) respectively.

DISCUSSION

The use of plants in treating diseases is as old as civilization25 and herbal medicine is still a major part of habitual treatment of different diseases26. The process in the preparation of herbs like pulverization, extraction and solvents deployed in the extraction of raw material for drugs affects the percentage yield of the biologically active compound present in the extracts. In this experiment, local solvents (ethanol, 50% hydro-ethanol, decoction and distil water) were used in Avocado fruit extract preparation. The percentage yield indicated that 50%hydro-ethanol (v/v)has the highest yield of 29.71% from the 30g dry weight of the fruit sample extracted while decoction extract yield 8.05% of the 30g dry weight of the sample. It is worthy of note that the traditional healer use decoction (boil the dry fruit pulp)as their method of extracting the biologically active component of the plant. It may be suggested that this method of extraction accounted for low yield of extract which may be lesser efficacious.

Result of the quantitative phytochemical assays indicated the concentration of the different quantity of the PC found in AFE though, its bioavailability is unpredictable in the in vivo study, because a lot of factors like absorption barrier of the PC in the gastro intestinal tract (GIT), the effects of different enzymes such as the glucosidase, esterase, oxidase and hydrolases originating from the host and the mycobiota which may inhibit PC activity in the GIT27. PC are known to possess varying antioxidant activities28-32. Antioxidant activity of a medicinal plant cannot be concluded based on a single antioxidant test model28 as such several in vitro antioxidant tests were conducted on the extracts using silymarin as positive control for all assays except metal chelating assay where citrate was used as the standard. The free radical scavenging capability of fruit of Avocado on the molecules of DPPH radicals, ABTS cations radical, the reducing power, superoxide anion radicals were determined; nevertheless, also assayed the hydroxyl radical which is one of the most potent ROS in the biological system that reacts with polyunsaturated fatty acid moieties of cell membrane phospholipid causing cellular damage33.

The result of the assay showed that ethanolic AFE has better performance in antioxidant activity compared to the standard and other extracts tested for DPPH, hydroxyl radical and metal chelating activities while hydro ethanol showed superior activity compared to the standard and other extracts tested in ABTS, superoxide anion and reducing power. All these predictions are based on the standard curve of percentage inhibition/scavenging effect and IC50 value of the tested extract which revealed a decrease in concentration of the ROS which may be due to the scavenging ability of AFE. Similar findings have been documented for the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of Avocado fruit34. It is noteworthy that the tested extract demonstrated the ability to neutralize the ROS at different degree which may be because of the presence of PC like polyphenols which has capability to directly scavenge superoxide and other ROS like hydroxyl and peroxyl radicals35-37. Saponins, triterpenes and phytosterol have been demonstrated to scavenge superoxide anion38-40. Flavonoid are currently receiving attention as a potential protector against variety of human disease, major flavonoid has been shown to have  neutralizing effect on free radical and ROS like hydroxyl radical, superoxide radical, hydrogen peroxides28, 39,41-43.

Marked postprandial hyperglycaemia is important in the pathogenesis of T2DM. It induces mitochondrial superoxide overproduction which potently inhibits the glycolytic enzyme glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate thus, diverting upstream metabolites from glycolytic pathway into pathway of glucose overutilization resulting in formation of diacyl glycerol from dihydroxyl acetone phosphate (DHAP) a potent activator of protein kinase C (PKC) which ultimately causes β-cells destruction and insulin resistance44-46. The unregulated hydrolysis of starch by α- amylase and α-glucosidase which catalyze the rate limiting step in the conversion of oligosaccharides and disaccharides into monosaccharide’s is responsible for the elevated blood glucose seen in T2DM. Therefore, controlling hyperglycaemia via inhibition of carbohydrate hydrolysing enzymes is an important strategy in the management of T2DM47-49. In vitro evaluation of the inhibitory effects of the AFE on α-glucosidase and pancreatic α- amylase enzymes was carried out using acarbose as the standard to determine its percentage inhibition and their respective IC50 value. Mild inhibition of α-amylase and strong inhibition of α- glucosidase enzymes is targeted as a way of reducing postprandial hyperglycaemia, and elimination of the unwanted effect like gastrointestinal discomfort flatulence, diarrhoea associated with the use of acarbose49,50. In this study, ethanol and decoction extracts mildly inhibit α- amylase with their respective IC50values of 0.57 and 0.62 µg/mL which is higher and significantly different (p<0.05) from acarbose with lower IC50 (0.47 µg/mL). The result of the inhibitory potentials of the extracts on α- glucosidase showed ethanol and decoction extracts has potent inhibition of the enzyme activity. Thus, it may be employed in the management of postprandial hyperglycemia. This finding is consistent with findings of many authors47,48,51 who described moderate inhibition of α- amylase and strong inhibition of α-glucosidase as a better therapeutic approach to be deployed in the delay and regulation of  carbohydrate hydrolysis in the intestine which is responsible for glucose toxicity observed in T2DM.

The ethanolic extract which possesses the highest IC50 for α- amylase enzyme and lowest IC50 for α- glucosidase compared to acarbose and other tested extracts of Avocado fruitwas used to determine the mode of inhibition of α- amylase and α- glucosidase enzymes in other to investigate its enzyme inhibition kinetics. Similar findings were observed by our previous study on Morinda citrifolia and its secondary metabolite scopoletin52-54. Nevertheless, our past research on Avocado’s antihyperglycemic, antidiabetic dyslipidemic and antioxidant potentials with different studies in in vivo models well line up with the present findings55-57Result for the mode of inhibition of α- amylase enzyme showed that the ethanolic AFE is competitively inhibiting the breakdown of disaccharides and oligosaccharides which are substrate for α- amylase. The Vmax values obtained with inhibitor and without inhibitor in the reaction pathway is the same, the Km values decreased from 4.85x10-2µM-1 for reaction pathway without inhibition to 1.44x10-2µM-1 with inhibitor. Decreased Km value signifies increase affinity. This result proposed competitive mode of inhibition.

However, the mode of inhibition of α-glucosidase by ethanolic AFE is by uncompetitive inhibition. The propose model is the binding of the AFE (inhibitor) to a site other than the active site and only when the substrate is binding to ES complex thereby inhibiting the formation of product. The kinetic further shows that there is a decrease in Km from 7.10x10-2 µM-1 to 4.69x10-2µM-1without inhibitor and with inhibitor respectively and also a decrease in Vmax from 19.76 µM/min without inhibition to 14.66 µM/min with inhibition which suggests a 39.74% decrease in overall activity of α- glucosidase enzyme in the presence of ethanolic extract of fruit of Persea americana Mill.

CONCLUSION

From this work, it has been conjectured that thefruit of Avocado has great and promising potential as pharmaceutical agent, particularly to be developed as anti-diabetic agents through the inhibition of α-glucosidase and α-amylase enzymes. This natural approach is thought to be safer and more effective compared to its synthetic version (e.g., acarbose and voglibose). Added to this, demonstrated the in vitro tests of the antioxidant activity of the fruit extract, which gives evidence and strong biochemical rationale of their therapeutic potential. Therefore, the promising results shall be carried forward to in vivo test as well as clinical trial to further validate the activity. Besides, data generated from these studies further promote the traditional use of plants in medicine. Therefore the fruit extract of P. Americana may play an important role in the development of nutraceuticals and also in the management of oxidative stress induced DM.

COMPETING INTERESTS

Authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

REFERENCES

  1. Chaudhary S, Gadhvi K, Chaudhary A. Comprehensive Review On World Herb Trade And Most Utilized Medicinal Plants. Int J Applied Bio Pharm Tech. 2010; 1(2): 510–517.
  2. Geun Kim H, Sook OH, M. Herbal Medicines for the Prevention and Treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Current Pharm Design. 2012; 18(1): 57–75.
  3. Jokar NK, Noorhosseini SA, Allahyari MS, Damalas CA. Consumers’ acceptance of medicinal herbs: An application of the technology acceptance model (TAM). J Ethnopharmacol, 2017; 207(June): 203–210.
  4. Jütte R, Heinrich M, Helmstädter A, Langhorst J, Meng G, Niebling W, Trampisch HJ. Herbal medicinal products – Evidence and tradition from a historical perspective. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017; 207: 220–225.
  5. Yea SJ, Kim BY, Kim C, Yi MY. A framework for the targeted selection of herbs with similar efficacy by exploiting drug repositioning technique and curated biomedical knowledge. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017; 208: 117–128.
  6. Scheen AJ. Drug treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in the 1990s. Achievements and future developments. Drugs. 1997; 54:355-368.
  7. American Diabetes Association: Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2018. Diabetes Care. 2018; 41(Supplement 1): S13-S27.
  8. Villanueva M, Verti S. "Avocado: Green gold mexico, michoacan pride". Government of the State of Michoacan. Mexico; 2007.
  9. Barry PC. Avocado: the Early Roots of Avocado History. Canku Ota. 2001; 33:12-29.
  10. SK Lee, RE Young, PM Schiffman, CW Coggins. Jr. maturity studies of avocado fruit based on picking dates and dry weight. J Amer Soc Hort Sci. 1983; 108:390-394.
  11. Stradley L. "All about avocados: history of the hass Avocado". What's Cooking America.net. Newberg, Yamhill County, Oregon: United States; 2004.
  12. Sofowora A. Medicinal plants and traditional medicine in Africa. Medicinal plants and traditional medicine in Africa. 1982. Chichester UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  13. Wolfe K, Wu X, Liu RH. Antioxidant Activity of Apple Peels. J Agric Food Chem. 2003; 51(3): 609–614.
  14. Swanny Kurniasih Djumali. Isolasi Dan Identifikasi Senyawa Flavonoid dari Fraksi Eter Daun Dewa (Gynura Procumbens Banker) 1997.
  15. Braca A, Tommasi N, Di-Bari L, Pizza C, Politi M, Morelli I. Antioxidant principles from Bauhinia tarapotensis. J Natural Products. 2001; 64(7): 892–895.
  16. Mathew S, Abraham TE. In vitro antioxidant activity and scavenging effects of Cinnamomum verum leaf extract assayed by different methodologies. Food Chem Toxicol. 2006; 44(2): 198–206. .
  17. Liu F, Ooi VE, Chang ST. Free radical scavenging activities of mushroom polysaccharide extracts. Life Sci. 1997; 60(10): 763–771.
  18. Dinis TCP, Madeira VMC, Almeida LM. Action of phenolic derivatives (Acetaminophen, Salicylate, and 5-Aminosalicylate) as inhibitors of membrane lipid peroxidation and as peroxyl radical scavengers. Arch Biochem Biophy. 1994; 315(1): 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1994.1485.
  19. Müller L, Fröhlich L, Böhm V. Comparative antioxidant activities of carotenoids measured by ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), ABTS bleaching assay (αTEAC), DPPH assay and peroxyl radical scavenging assay. Food Chem. 2011; 129(1): 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2011.04.045.
  20. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved abts radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 1999; 26(9): 1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3.
  21. Apostolidis E, Kwon YI, Shetty K. Inhibitory potential of herb, fruit, and fungal-enriched cheese against key enzymes linked to type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Innovative Food Sci Emerging Technol. 2007; 8(1): 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2006.06.001.
  22. Ali H, Houghton PJ, Soumyanath A. α-Amylase inshibitory activity of some Malaysian plants used to treat diabetes; with particular reference to Phyllanthus amarus. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006; 107(3): 449–455.
  23. Nagmoti DM, Juvekar AR. In vitro inhibitory effects of Pithecellobiumdulce (Roxb.) Benth. seeds on intestinal α-glucosidase and pancreatic α-amylase. J Biochem Technol. 2013; 4(3): 616–621.
  24. Lineweaver H, Burk D. The determination of enzyme dissociation constants. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1934; 56(3): 658–666.
  25. Fabricant DS, Farnsworth NR. The value of plants used in traditional medicine for drug discovery. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2001; 109(SUPPL. 1): 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109s169.
  26. Cragg GM, Newman DJ. Natural products: A continuing source of novel drug leads. Biochimicaet Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects. 2013; 1830(6): 3670–3695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.02.008.
  27. Erlânio O Sousaab, Camila MBA, Mirandaab, Camila B. Nobreab,  Aline A. Boligonc, Margareth L. Athaydec, José Costa GM. Phytochemical analysis and antioxidant activities of Lantana camara and Lantana montevidensis Industrial Crops and Products. 2015; 70: 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.010.
  28. Egea J, Fabregat I, Frapart YM, Ghezzi P, Görlach A, Kietzmann T, Daiber A. Redox Biology European contribution to the study of ROS?: A summary of the findings and prospects for the future from the cost action BM1203 (EU-ROS). 2017; 13: 94 162.
  29. Huang W, Cai Y, Zhang Y, Huang W, Cai Y. Natural Phenolic Compounds From Medicinal Herbs and Dietary Plants?: Potential use for cancer prevention and dietary plants?: potential use for cancer prevention, nutrition and cancer. 2017; 62: 1-20.
  30. Iranshahy M, Javadi B, Iranshahi M, Jahanbakhs SP, Mahyari S, Hassani FV, Karimi G. A review of traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Portula caoleracea J Ethnopharmacol. 2017; 205: 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2017.05.004.
  31. Liu Y, Wang H, Cai X. Optimization of the extraction of total flavonoids from Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi using the response surface methodology. J Food Sci Technol. 2015; 52(4): 2336–2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1275-0.
  32. Tafesse TB, Hymete A, Mekonnen Y, Tadesse M. Antidiabetic activity and phytochemical screening of extracts of the leaves of Ajugaremota Benth on alloxan-induced diabetic mice, BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2017; 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1757-5.
  33. Greenwald, R. Handbook Methods for Oxygen Radical Research. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 1985.
  34. Mark L. Dreher and Adrienne J. Davenport Hass Avocado Composition and Potential Health Effects, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2013; 53(7): 738-750, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.556759.
  35. Azofeifa G, Quesada S, Boudard F, Morena M, Cristol J, Pe AM, Montpellier U. Antioxidant and Anti-inflammatory in vitro Activities of Phenolic Compounds from Tropical Highland Blackberry (Rubus adenotrichos). J Agric Food Chem. 2013; 61: 5798-5804.
  36. Medini F, Fellah H, Ksouri R, Abdelly C. Total phenolic, flavonoid and tannin contents and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of organic extracts of shoots of the plant Limonium delicatulum. J Taibah University for Sci. 2014; 8(3): 216–224.
  37. Pandey KB, Rizvi SI. Plant polyphenols as dietary antioxidants in human health and disease. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2009; 2(5):270–278. https://doi.org/10.4161/oxim.2.5.9498.
  38. Dufour D, Lavoie S, Laprise C, Legault J. Antioxidant , anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities of methanolic extracts from Ledumgroenlandicum Retzius. J Ethnopharmacol, 2007; 111: 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2006.10.021.
  39. Repetto MG, Llesuy SF, Aires B. Antioxidant properties of natural compounds used in popular medicine for gastric ulcers. Brazilian J Med Biol Res. 2002; 35: 523–534.
  40. Zhao J, Xu F, Huang H, Gu Z, Wang L, Tan W, Li C. Antitumor , and Antioxidant Potential of Total Saponins from Nigella glandulifera Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2013: 1-8.
  41. Hiya A Mahmassani, Esther E Avendano, Gowri Raman, Elizabeth J Johnson. Avocado consumption and risk factors for heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The American J Clin Nutrition. 2018; 107(4):523-536.
  42. Kim KH, Moon E, Choi SU, Kim SY, Lee KR. Polyphenols from the bark of Rhusverniciflua and their biological evaluation on antitumor and anti-inflammatory activities. Phytochem. 2013; 92: 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2013.05.005.
  43. Shakya AK. Medicinal plants?: Future source of new drugs. Int J Herbal Medicine. 2016; 4(4): 59–64.
  44. King GL, Loeken MR. Hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress in diabetic complication. Histochem Cell Biol. 2017; 133: 333-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-004-0678-9.
  45. Tiwari BK, Pandey KB, Abidi AB, Rizvi SI. Markers of oxidative stress during diabetes mellitus. J Biomarkers. 2013; 1-7.
  46. Ullah A. Diabetes mellitus and oxidative stress –– A concise review. Saudi Pharm J. 2016; 24(5): 547–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2015.03.013.
  47. Mbhele N, Balogun FO, Kazeem MI, Ashafa T. In vitro studies on the antimicrobial, antioxidant and antidiabetic potential of cephalariagigantea. Bangladesh J Pharmacol, 2015; 10(1): 214–221. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjp.v10i1.21716.
  48. Mohamed EAH, Yam MF, Siddiqol MJA, Asmawi MZ, Sadikun A, Ang LF, Chan SH. Potent alpha-glucosidase and alpha-amylase inhibitory activities of standardized 50% ethanolic extracts and sinensetin from Orthosiphonstamineus Benth as anti-diabetic mechanism. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2012; 12(1): 176. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-176.
  49. Sabiu S, O’Neill FH, Ashafa AOT. Kinetics of α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory potential of Zea mays Linnaeus (Poaceae). Stigma maydis aqueous extract: An in vitro J Ethnopharmacol. 2016; 183: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.02.024.
  50. Kazeem MI, Adamson JO, Ogunwande IA. Modes of inhibition of α -amylase and α -glucosidase by aqueous extract of morinda lucidabenth Bio Med Res International. 2013; 1–6.
  51. Olaokun OO, McGaw LJ, Rensburg IJ, Van, Eloff JN, Naidoo V. Antidiabetic activity of the ethyl acetate fraction of Ficuslutea (Moraceae) leaf extract?: comparison of an in vitro assay with an in vivo obese mouse model. BMC complementary and alternative medicine 2016; 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1087-z.
  52. Rao USM, Subramaniam S. Biochemical evaluation of antihyperglycemic and antioxidative effects of Morinda citrifolia fruit extract studied in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Med. Chem. Res.2009; 18(6): 433-446.
  53. Subramaniam SP, Rao USM. Amelioration of diabetic dyslipidemia by Morinda citrifolia fruits on streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. J. Pharm. Res. 2010; 3(4): 843-848.
  54. Masitah K, Fazilah T, Nor Syamira R, Saravanan D, Khamsah Suryati M, Sasidharan S, Zubaidi Abdul L, Rao USM. Utharkar. In vitro α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition and increased glucose uptake of Morinda citrifolia fruit and scopoletin. Research J Pharm Tech. 2015; 8(2): 189-193.
  55. Rao USM, Bizuneh Adinew. Remnant Β-cell stimulative and anti-oxidative effects of persea americana fruit extract studied in rats introduced into streptozotocin-induced hyperglycaemic state. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2011; 8(3): 210-217.
  56. Rao USM, M Haque, AABaig. Insulin stimulative and anti-oxidative effects of persea americana fruit extract on streptozotocin induced hyperglycemic rats. J Med Bio Sci. 2011; 4 (1): 1-10.
  57. Rao USM, Arirudran B. Clinical evaluation to assess the efficacy of ethanolic extract of avocado fruit on diabetic dyslipidemia studied in stz- induced experimental albino rats. Asian J Research Chem. 2011; 4(7): 1131-1136.

  

Table 1: The percentage yield from different extracting solvents used in AFE.

AFE

Ethanol

50%Hydro-

ethanol

Decoction

Aqueous

Percentage yield (%)

11.12

29.71

8.05

18.55

Values are mean and standard deviation (SD) of triplicate determination. n=3; (p<0.05).

Table 2: Phytochemical constituents of the AFE with different extracting solvents.

Phytochemicals

Ethanol

50%Hydro-

ethanol

Decoction

  Aqueous

Alkaloids

+++

+++

++

++

Phenols

+++

++++      

+++

++          

Flavonoids

+

+

 -

-

Anthraquinones

++

++

+++

+++

Tannins

++++

++++

++

++

Triterpenes

-

++

+++        

++++      

Phytosterol

-

++

+++

+++

+: detected; +++: degree of intensity; -: not detected or in trace amount.

 

 

Table 3: The result of the quantitative phytochemical screening of AFEwith different extracting solvents.

Phytochemicals

Ethanol

50%Hydro-

ethanol

Decoction

Aqueous

TFC (mg quercetin in g-1)

0.36

1.10

0.61

0.30

TPC (mg gallic acid g-1)

8.35

10.29

10.79

10.41

  

Table 4: The IC50 values of the free radical scavenging/ chelating capabilities of different extracts of P. Americana fruit

Samples

IC50 (µg/mL)

DPPH

ABTS

Hydroxyl

Superoxide

Metal

Chelating

Silymarin

1.09 ± 0.02

0.39 ± 0.05

1.12 ± 0.02

1.12 ± 0.01

-

Citrate

-

-

-

-

1.51± 0.01

Ethanol

0.52 ± 0.05

0.38 ± 0.02

0.59 ± 0.01

0.63 ± 0.10

0.39± 0.01

Hydro-ethanol

1.15 ± 0.03

0.30 ± 0.02

0.94 ± 0.01

0.49 ± 0.00

0.41±0 .05

Decoction

1.78 ± 0.01

0.49 ± 0.02

1.03 ± 0.01

0.57 ± 0.01

1.73± .02  

Aqueous

1.05 ± 0.01

0.49 ± 0.05

1.76 ± 0.01

0.60 ± 0.01

0.67± .01

The values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of triplicate determination. (p<0.05). Silymarin is the standard antioxidant agent for all the antioxidant assays except metal chelating that has citrate as the standard.

    

Table 5: The IC50 values for different extracts of P. americana fruit on specific activities of α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes.

Samples

            IC50 (µg/mL)

α- Glucosidase

α-Amylase

Acarbose

0.52 ± 0.04

0.47 ± 0.01

Ethanol

0.15 ± 0.00

0.57 ± 0.01

50%Hydro-ethanol

0.39 ± 0.00

0.42 ± 0.05

Decoction

0.46 ± 0.01

0.62 ± 0.03

Aqueous

0.45 ± 0.04

0.53 ± 0.08

The values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of triplicate determination. Means down vertical column not sharing a common superscript are significantly different (p<0.05) from each other.