PHYTOCHEMICAL SCREENING AND THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHIC OF PRUNUS DULCIS (ALMOND) MEDICINAL PLANT LEAVES USED IN FOLK MEDICINE FOR TREATMENT OF WOUNDS AND BURNS IN HUFASH DISTRICT AL MAHWEET GOVERNORATE–YEMEN
Aziza M. Taj Al-Deen1, Samir Ahmed Ali ALhaidari1, Ali Gamal Al-Kaf2,
Fatima A. Al-Hadi1, Anas Al Mahbashi1
1Biology Department -Faculty of Science, Sana'a University, Yemen.
2Medicinal chemistry Department, Faculty of pharmacy, Sana'a University,Yemen.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v4i2.252
In this study methanolic and aqueous extracts of one plant namely Prunus dulcis were screened for the presence of phytochemical constituents and tested for their antimicrobial and antioxidant activity. The qualitative phytochemical analysis revealed the results showed presence of alkaloids, terpenoids, glycosides, resins, saponins, tannins, flavonoids, phenols, and amino acid were present in the methanol extract, with absence of glycosides, and amino acids in the aqueous extracts in leaves plant. TLC tests conducted revealed Rf values in the leaves for alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, phenols and saponins(0.92-0.96-0.96-0.95-0.96) respectively. The antimicrobial activity extracts against four bacterial isolates Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli , Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella sp. and a single fungal isolate Candida albicans with concentrations (0.5 mg/ml, and 1,0 mg/ml) of the extract were added to the disc and respective solvent was used as negative control. The antioxidative activity of leaf was evaluated by using 1,1- diphenyl-2 picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), the results showed are 85.5%, lowest from standard, ascorbic acid 87.5%.
Keywords: Antimicrobial, antioxidative, phytochemical, Prunus dulcis.
INTRODUCTION
Prunus dulcis (Almond) belongs to the family Rosaceae, which is a widely grown fruit tree that is commercially important throughout the world. It is native to mountainous regions of Central Asia1. The skin of the Prunus dulcis nut accounts for 4% of the total nut weight and is rich in polyphenols, including hydroxybenzoic acids and aldehydes, flavonol and flavanone aglycones, and glycosides2. Antioxidant activity of almond extract was investigated by DPP?, ABT?+, O? radical scavenging, metal chelating activity and determination of lipid peroxidation levels (TBARS). Almond extract scavenged 89.50% of the ABTS radical, 66.77% of the hydroxyl radical, and 87.30% of the DPPH radical3.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Samples extraction
The Samples of 100g of the grinded powder were put in sterilized flasks together with 400 ml of pure methanol for methanolic extraction treatments, while for aqueous extraction treatments, samples of 100g of grinded powder were put in sterilized flasks with 400 ml of distilled water each. All flasks were covered with transparent nylon and tin and then all were put on a rotary shaker machine for 24 hours, the speed of the device was 200 r/m at the laboratory temperature (22.7oC). The filtration process for each sample was carried out using filter paper to obtain a pure solution. The evaporation process for each methanol solution and distilled water was conducted separately in the evaporator (methanol solution at 42oC and pressure 337. The distilled water solution at 45°C and pressure 72 for 2 hours for methanol solution and 4 hours for distilled water solution. Then obtained extracts were kept in dark conditions in the refrigerator at 4°C until used in the experiment4.
QUALITATIVE TESTS
Phytochemical screening of plant extracts:
The methanolic and aqueous extracts subjected to phytochemical screening were alkaloids, terpenoids, glycosides, resins, saponins, tannins, flavonoids, phenols, and amino acids5,6.
Thin Layer Chromatographic.
One gram of Prunus dulcis powder was boiled with of with solvent system made from 15ml H2SO4 test for Alkaloids, 10ml 70% ethanol test for flavonoids and saponins, 25 ml water test for Tannins and Phenols15ml H2SO4 test for Alkaloids in rounded flasks. The TLC plate was prepared as such : (Layer : silica gel layers 0.25 mm thickness, 10 cm length and 5cm wide). The filtrate obtained was evaporated to dryness in a water bath at 37° C .The residue was dissolved by 0.2ml methanol. The solution was used for spotting the TLC by capillary tube by only one centered spot. The TLC plate was put inside a saturated tank, and development was waited. When the mobile phase reaches two thirds of plate’s length, the plate was lifted out from the tank and let to dry in air. The plate was examined by U.V. lamp at the wavelength 365nm. The colors of florescence appeared and recorded. The plate was sprayed carefully reagent, and let to dry for 10 min, then sprayed with solution. After it plate was examined under U.V. lamp at the wave length 365nm. The iodine was used as the visualizing agent to detect the spot. A meter rule was used to measure the distance moved by the solvent and distance moved by spot, from which the retention factor (Rf values) of the various spots was calculated7. TLC was performed for alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins and phenols solvent system and confirmatory tests are shown in Table 2. Calculation of RF of each spot was as follows:
Antimicrobial Activity of Plants extracts
Microbial Cultures: Fresh plates of the four bacterial isolates Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella sp. and a single fungal isolate Candida albicans were obtained from the National Center of Public Health Laboratories, Sana’a.
Media Use: The bacterial test were spread over the nutrient ager (56g/1000ML distilled Water) was weight into separate flask and dispensed into distilled water make a total volume of 1 liter. Then the fungal test were spread over the sabouraud dextrose agar (65g/1000ML distilled Water) was weighted into separate flask and dispensed into distilled water to make a total volume of 1 liter. These powders were dissolved in distilled water and used for evaluation of their antibacterial and antifungal activities. The mixture was heated in an electric water bath (GFC, 1083, Germany) until the Agar melted to form a homogenous solution. The prepared medium was separately transferred to Durum medium bottle and sterilized by autoclaving at 1210 C for 30 minutes. The sterile medium was allowed to cool to about 45oC before being poured aseptically in an inoculation. Chamber (Ceslab England) in 15 ml portions, into sterile petri dishes to cool and gel into solids8.
Antimicrobial activity assay: Two different concentrations (0.5 mg/ml, and 1,0 mg/ml) of the extract were added to the disc and respective solvent was used as negative control.
Zone of Inhibition: The bacteria plates were incubated at 37oC for 24hrs while the fungal plates were incubated at for 72 hours, and observed for the zone of inhibition of growth, The zones were measured with a transparent ruler and the result recorded.
Determination of antioxidant activity
The scavenging ability of the natural antioxidants of the leaves towards the stable free radical DPPH was measured by the method as used in a previous study9. The leaf extracts (20μl) were added to 0.5ml of methanolic solution of DPPH (0.3mM in methanol) and 0.48ml of methanol. The mixture was allowed to react at room temperature for 30 min. Methanol served as the blank and DPPH in methanol, without the leaf extracts, Served as the positive control. After 30 min of incubation, the discolouration of the purple colour was measured at 517 nm in a spectrophotometer). The radical scavenging activity was calculated as follows:
Statistical Analysis
Analysis of variance was made for all data using (SPSS) version (25) computer program.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In this study methanolic and aqueous extracts of one plants namely Prunus dulcis, were screened for the presence of phytochemical constituents and tested for their microbial and antioxidant activity.
Yield from different solvents
Yield of methanolic extract of Prunus dulci, extracted with 100% methanol produced 28.65 (g). While yield of distilled water extract of Prunus dulcis produced 25.33(g). Mean values of the yield are presented as mean ± SEM. Values are statistically significant when p≤ 0.05. Unfortunately no literature was found on yield of neither methanolic nor aqueous extracts of leaves of Prunus dulcis.
Phytochemical composition of the methanolic and aqueous leaves extracts.
The summarized phytochemical screening of chemical constituents of Prunus dulcis extract is shown in Table 4. The results revealed the presence of active compounds in the two different extracts. As the table shows, the methanol and aqueous extracts indicate the presence alkaloids, terpenoids, glycosides, resins, saponins, tannins, flavonoids, phenols, and amino acid were present in the methanol extract, with absence of glycosides, and amino acids in the aqueous extracts in all three plants . In a study done in a previous study in their study to detect chemical constituents of the leaves of P. dulcis by the approach based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) combined with isolation and structure elucidation of pure compounds by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) analysis detected phenolics, terpenoids and a cyanogenic glycoside which is more specific than our findings10. The almond (P.dulcis) extract studied by indicated the presence of phytochemicals including phenolic compounds and flavonoids11.
Thin layer chromatography (TLC)
Five secondary metabolites (alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, phenols and saponins) were used for (TLC) thin layer chromatographic analysis. TLC tests conducted revealed Rf values in the leaves of Prunus dulcis for alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, phenols and saponins (0.92-0.96-0.96-0.95-0.96) respectively. Prunus dulcis leaves have been reported to exert some biological activity, in particular potent free radical-scavenging capacity, but so far there is limited information on their chemical composition.
Antibacterial and antifungal activity of plants extracts.
Antimicrobial activity of standard antibiotics discs against tested bacterial and Fungal are displayed in Table 5.The results of the study indicated that control Antibiotics against bacteria and Fungi showed different inhibitory zones. Antibiotics activity of AM (10ug) , CIP(25ug), CF(30ug), PZ (75ug) and PC (100ug) against Staphylococcus aureus were 19, 26, 20, 21, 20 mm ; E. coli 17, 28, 18, 20, 19 mm; Pseudomonas aeruginosa 18, 30, 17, 21, 18 mm; Klebsilla sp. 20, 33, 22, 23, 17 mm, and Candida albicans 21, 31, 20, 19, 22 mm respectively.
It is clear from Table 6, that the antimicrobial activity of the two methanol concentrations of Prunus dulcis gave lower inhibition zones than all antibiotics used in the study. As shown in Table 7, the antimicrobial activity of both aqueous concentrations of Prunus dulcis were lower in inhibition zones than all antibiotics except E. coli which had the closest activity to AM Staphylococcus aureus..a nearly to AM and candida albicans nearly to PZ. This study showed that Ciprofloxacin (30µg) gave the highest inhibition zone among all antibiotics with the selected organisms 26, 28, 30 mm against Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa respectively. In a similar study12 Ciprofloxacin (25µg) gave high diameter of inhibition zone which reached up 19, 23, 23 mm against Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa respectively. The majority of the antibacterial activity in this study was found in the methanolic rather than the aqueous extracts, and the highest activity was found in the methanolic extracts from Prunus dulcis. Similar results were achieved by in another study13. In the present study it was observed that the extract of Prunus dulcis leaves showed antimicrobial activities, with varies values, against all the tested organisms, as indicated in Table 7. Unfortunately no literature was found on extracts of neither methanolic nor aqueous extracts of leaves of Prunus dulcis in antimicrobial activities.
Antioxidant activity
Results showed are 85.5%, lowest from standard, ascorbic acid 87.5% (Table 8).
In a previous study done it was found that the total antioxidant activity of prunus amygdalus leaves extract was 1377 mg/ml while 85.5% of prunus dulcis in present study14.
CONCLUSION
The present study showed that prunus dulcis are rich sources of useful secondary metabolites, it is strongly recommended of using them for general medicinal purpose and especially for treat wounds and burns diseases. It is strongly recommended of using them for production of effective pharmaceutical compounds and can be used as natural products of antimicrobial to treat wounds and burns diseases instead of chemical drugs. It is noticeable that the leaves of prunus dulcis are very rich in antioxidant content and therefore are good sources and safe and cheap for that.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
"No conflict of interest associated with this work”.
REFERENCES
Table 1: Qualitative tests for Phytochemical screening.
Phytochemical |
Test Procedure |
Alkaloids |
In a test tube, 2-3 drops of Dragendorff’s reagent was added to 0.1 ml of the extract orange precipitate indicated the presence of alkaloids. Dragendorff’s test. |
Terpenoids |
In a test tube 5ml of extract was mixed in 2 ml of chloroform and then 3ml of concentrated sulfuric acid was added to form a layer. A reddish brown coloration forms at interface. Salkowski test. |
Glycosides |
Concentrated sulfuric acid in a test tube and extract sample were mixed with glacial acetic acid containing 1 drop of Ferric chloride (1:1:1volume). A brown ring appears in the presence of glycosides. Keller-Killani test. |
Resins |
To 5ml extract 5ml distilled water was added, the occurrence of turbidity shows the presence of resins. Turbidity test. |
Saponins |
To 5ml extract 5ml distilled water was added, the occurrence of turbidity shows the presence of resins. Foam test. |
Tannins |
A 4 ml extract was treated with 4 ml FeCl3, the formation of green colour was taken as positive for tannin. Fecl3 test. |
Flavonoids |
Extract was mixed with magnesium ribbon fragments, and concentrated hydrochloric acid was added drop wise. Orange, red, pink, or purple coloration indicates the presence of flavonoids. Shinoda test. |
Phenols |
Extract was mixed with 2 ml of 2% solution of FeCl3. A blue-green or black coloration indicated the presence of phenols. Fecl3 test. |
Amino acids |
Extracts and 1 drop 2% Copper sulphate solution and 1 ml 95% ethanol excess of potassium hydroxide were mixed. Pink or yellow color in ethanol layer appears Biuret test. |
Table 2: Rf values of TLC solvent system for different extracts of Prunus dulcis.
RF Value |
Extract |
Confirmatory test |
Mobile phase |
Phytochemical |
0.96 |
1 ml HCL+9 ml water |
Dragendorff reagent |
Acetone:water:26% ammonia (90:7:3) |
Alkaloids |
0.97 |
70% ethanol |
Aluminum chloride reagent |
Chloroform: Ethyl acetate (6:4) |
Flavonoides |
0.99 |
25ml water |
10% FeCl3 reagent |
Chloroform: Ethyl acetate (6:4) |
Tannins |
0.97 |
Methanol |
10% KOH reagent |
Toluene: Acetone: Formic acid (60:60:10) |
Phenols |
0.99 |
Methanol |
Vanillin sulfuric acid reagent |
Ethyl acetate |
Saponins |
Table 3: Yields of Prunus dulcis leaves extracts from Methanolic and Aqueous extracts
Extract yield/ (g)* |
Volume of the solvent used (ml) |
Solvent
|
Amount of samples used (g) |
Powder of plants
|
M
|
28.65±0.07 |
400 |
Pure Methanol |
100 |
Prunus dulcis |
1- |
25.33±0.06 |
400 |
Distilled water |
100 |
Prunus dulcis |
2- |
Mean values of the yield are presented as mean ± SEM. Values are statistically significant when p≤ 0.05.
Table 4: Phytochemical composition of the methanolic and aqueous Leaves Extracts of Prunus dulcis.
Plant |
Prunus dulcis |
||||||||
Chemical Compounds/ Solvents |
Alkaloids |
Terpenoids |
Glycosides |
Resins |
Saponins |
Tannins |
Flavonoids |
Phenols |
Amino acids |
Methanolic extract |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Aqueous extract |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
Absence (+) Presence (-).
Table 5: Antimicrobial activity of standard antibiotics discs against tested bacterial and fungal.
Inhibition zones diameter (mm) of tested antibiotic |
|||||
PC(100ug) |
PZ (75ug) |
CF(30ug) |
CIP(25ug) |
AM(10ug) |
Antibiotic |
Organisms |
|||||
20 |
21 |
20 |
26 |
19 |
Staphylococcus aureus |
19 |
20 |
18 |
28 |
17 |
Escherichia coli. |
18 |
21 |
17 |
30 |
18 |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa. |
17 |
23 |
22 |
33 |
20 |
Klebsiella sp. |
22 |
19 |
20 |
31 |
21 |
Candida albicans |
AM=Amoxycillin.CIP= Ciprofloxacin. CF=cefazllin. PZ=Cefoperazone.PC=piperacillin.
Table 6: Antimicrobial activity of the methanolic extracts of leaves of (Prunus dulcis) and standard antibiotics discs against tested bacterial and fungal.
Zone of inhibition(mm) Antibiotic |
Organisms |
||||||
PC(100ug) |
PZ(75ug) |
CF(30ug) |
CIP(25ug) |
AM(10ug) |
1.0g/ml |
0.5g/ml |
|
20 |
21 |
20 |
26 |
19 |
13 |
15 |
Staphylococcus aureus. |
19 |
20 |
18 |
28 |
17 |
14 |
14 |
Escherichia coli. |
18 |
21 |
17 |
30 |
18 |
14 |
13 |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa. |
17 |
23 |
22 |
33 |
20 |
14 |
12 |
Klebsiella sp. |
22 |
19 |
20 |
31 |
21 |
11 |
13 |
Candida albicans. |
Table 7: Antimicrobial activity of the Aqueous extract of leaves (Prunus dulcis) and standard antibiotics discs against tested bacterial and fungual.
Zone of inhibition(mm) Antibiotic |
Organisms |
||||||
PC(100ug) |
PZ(75ug) |
CF(30ug) |
CIP(25ug) |
AM(10ug) |
1.0g/ml |
0.5g/ml |
|
20 |
21 |
20 |
26 |
19 |
17 |
18 |
Staphylococcus aureus. |
19 |
20 |
18 |
28 |
17 |
16 |
17 |
Escherichia coli. |
18 |
21 |
17 |
30 |
18 |
16 |
16 |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa. |
17 |
23 |
22 |
33 |
20 |
14 |
13 |
Klebsiella sp. |
22 |
19 |
20 |
31 |
21 |
18 |
16 |
Candida albicans. |
Table 8: Antioxidant activities of the selected extracts and L- ascorbic acid using the (DPPH) free radical-scavenging assay
Plants |
Antioxidant activity DPPH (g/ml) |
L- ascorbic acid |
87.5 |
Prunus dulcis |
85.5 |