IDENTIFICATION AND PRIORITIZATION OF BARRIERS TO IMPLEMENT THE GREEN HOSPITAL STANDARDS AT IMAM HASSAN MOJTABA HOSPITAL IN DARAB

Abbas Yazdanpanah1, Marjan Yazdi1, Parviz Aghayii Barzabad2

1Department of Healthcare Management, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran.

2Department of Medical Education Management, Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.

ABSTRACT

One of the most important issues being discussed globally is the environmental protection. The study and review of the standard of the Green Hospital is of particular importance because hospitals are the second most polluting industry. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify and prioritize the barriers to implement Green Hospital standards at Imam Hassan Mojtaba Hospital in Darab. The present study was descriptive-applied. The statistical population in this study was a number of knowledgeable personnel and managers regarding the standards of Green Hospital in Darab, and the number of samples was 8 people who were selected through purposeful sampling. The tools used to collect information in this research were interviews, questionnaires, tables, databases and computer networks. In addition, the multi-criteria decision-making model of TOPSIS was used in this research for component-based ranking related to the research. Data were gathered through questionnaires and interviews with personnel and managers. Then, Excel software was used to analyze the statistical data. The results showed that conceptual model included five groups of environmental factors, technological factors, awareness and knowledge factors, economic factors and human resource factors. Meanwhile, the barriers to knowledge with the value of CL=1 were identified as the most important ones for implementation of the Green Hospital standards in Imam Hassan Mojtaba Hospital in Darab. The technology barriers index with CL value of 0.690 was assigned in the second place, then the human barriers index with CL = 0.493, economic barriers with CL = 0.39 and environmental barriers with CL = 0.223 were the next priorities. According to the results of the present study, the barriers to knowledge and awareness were identified as the most important ones for the implementation of the Green Hospital standards in Imam Hassan Mojtaba Hospital of Darab. Another result of this study was the impact of lack of infrastructure for technology Information as one of the most important barriers to implement Green Hospital standards.

Keywords: Barriers, Green hospital, standard.

INTRODUCTION

Hospitals and healthcare staffs with sustainable and economical environmental approaches can be the main promoters of environmental protection in a broader range such as the global community. Hospitals and healthcare systems can contribute to sustainability, greater equity and environmental protection through investing on healthy buildings, green purchases and sustainable operations, in addition to coping with climate change. Hospitals and healthcare systems can enhance their economic position and moral standing in the community by helping achieve the millennium development goals in terms of health, sustainability and green economy. In addition to its traditional role in delivering high-quality care, the healthcare sector can create common health, economic and social benefits through reducing its environmental impacts and improve public health1.

There is no universal standard for the definition of "green and healthy hospitals". But in principle, it can be defined as follows: A green and healthy hospital is one that promotes the health of the people by continually reducing environmental outcomes and eliminating their contribution to the burden of disease. The green and healthy hospital knows the link between human health and the environment, and shows such recognition through its management, strategy, and operation. It links its needs with environmental measures, and reflects its commitment to the environment with actively contributing to the development and strength of the community's environment, equality in the health and the green economy by adopting preventive measures. There is no uniform pattern for green and healthy hospitals, and many hospitals and healthcare systems worldwide have taken measures to reduce environmental footprint, participate in public health and save costs simultaneously2.

There are many factors that are effective on barriers to implement hospital standards. Esa et al. believe that lack of awareness; education and information about the benefits of green hospitals are the most important barriers to the implementation of green hospitals3. From the perspective of Luthra et al. lack of knowledge of customers, high cost of implementation, senior management's non-commitment, government's lack of support, lack of organizational encouragement were identified as the most important barriers to the implementation of green hospital standards4. Dashore et al. believed that the obstacles to implementation of the Green Hospital are human factors, organizational factors, and intra-organization factors5.

The results obtained by Balasubramanian et al. show that factors such as the lack of governmental regulations and laws, lack of knowledge and experience, the costs of implementing  green activities, unacceptance of advances in new technology, non-commitment to high level management, lack of management plans for transportation and logistics, market competition and uncertainty, financial implications, lack of education about green activity are the most important in the non-implementation of green hospital standards. This means that increasing the weight of each of these factors will reduce the implementation of green hospital standards6. Omidvar et al. stated that the factors of lack of support of senior and middle managers of the organization, the lack of appropriate information and communication technology infrastructure to facilitate the implementation of green activity, the difficulty of coordinating and organizing units in the implementation of activities, high costs of implementation, lack of proper incentives from the government to achieve green activities, lack of knowledge and education on environmental issues have an inverse relationship with the implementation of Green Hospital standards. This means that with increase of each of these factors, the feasibility of implementing green hospital standards will be reduced7. Considering the importance of green activities for hospitals from environmental, economic and cost savings viewpoints, increasing income and profits and identifying the obstacles to implementation of Green Hospital standards in hospitals, the researcher seeks to identify and prioritize Green Hospital standards in Darab Hospital.

METHODS

The present study was descriptive-applied. It is applicable because the results can be used by managers, decision-makers and planners of hospitals. The statistical population in this research included a number of knowledgeable personnel and managers in Imam Hassan Mojtaba in Darab in the field of green hospital standards and the number of samples was 8 people who were selected through purposeful sampling.

The tools used to collect information in this research were interviews, questionnaires, tables, databases and computer networks. Data were gathered through a questionnaire and interview with knowledgeable staff and managers of Darab Hospital. All ethical issues in the research were considered. These included receiving a letter of introduction from the Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht branch, presenting it to healthcare system in the city of Darab, ensuring the hospital authorities to keep the information confidential, and explaining the interviewees about the purpose of the research. Also, all individuals selected for interviewing and filling in the questionnaire were completely free to provide information and in case of dissatisfaction, the person was removed from interviewing and filling the questionnaire and someone else was replaced. Honesty has been considered in the analysis of data. In this research, the multi-criteria decision-making model of TOPSIS was used for component-based ranking in the research. This technique, first proposed by Hwang and Yoon, is one of the most important multiple attribute decision-making techniques for dealing with world affairs6.

In ideal point-based methods, the sorting of a set of options is based on their separation from the ideal point. The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is one of the most commonly used methods. Based on this technique, the best option is one that is simultaneously the closest unit to the ideal point and the farthest unit from the negative ideal point, TOPSIS both requires a steady increase in utility (the larger the value of the attribute is, the better the option will be) and a steady decrease in utility (the smaller the attribute value is the better the option will be). One of the important advantages of this method is that both objective and subjective criteria and indicators can be used simultaneously. However, in this model for mathematical calculations, all values assigned to the criteria were quantitative, and if they are qualitatively attributed to the criteria, they should be converted into quantitative values. Although the TOPSIS method can be used both in Raster and SIG, this technique is particularly suited to the structure of the Raster data. To analyze the statistical data, Excel software was used.

RESULTS

The results have been set in two general sections. In the first section, data analysis was done using content analysis method. In the second part, the statistical methods used to analyze the data from the questionnaire have been studied.

Application of theme analysis

First, the text of the interviews was carefully implemented and used for analysis. To analyze the text of the interviews, the interview text was first based on the recorded voice of the interviewee, and then it was completed by taking notes during interviewing. Then, by carefully studying these texts, at first, for each of the interviews, all independent ideas were identified in the form of concepts and sub-themes, and after the combination of sub-themes, the main themes were constructed. The most principle themes extracted from the present research are as follows:

Economic barriers

Frense et al. addressed a study entitled "going towards greener hospitals in the USA" and concluded that hospitals' plans for being greener are one of the appropriate ways to reduce costs and improve the environment of the hospital for patients and employees. In an interview with hospital staff, economic barriers have been identified as barriers to implement green hospital standards.

Barriers to knowledge and awareness

So as to reduce damages to patients, surrounding communities and the environment in green hospitals, the managers of hospitals should formulate managerial plans in terms of energy conservation, proper disposal of medical waste and safe management of medicine. In an interview with hospital staff, barriers to awareness and knowledge have been identified as barriers to implement green hospital standards8.

Lack of recognition of technology

The first sub-theme mentioned in Table 4 is the technology's lack of recognition, four concepts was referred to after interviews. The first concept involves "the lack of recognition of technology by employees.

Environmental barriers

The Green Hospital recognizes the environment and shows it through its management, strategy, and operations. In other words, this kind of hospitals, according to their mission, binds their needs with environmental measures, and by actively contributing to the development, strength of the community's environment and health equity shows its commitment to the environment via adopting preventive measures. According to interviews with hospital staff, environmental barriers are considered as ones to the implementation of Green hospital standards.

Summarizing extracted themes

After the study of research literature and interviews with hospital staff and managers, the following main themes and sub-themes were extracted. In the figure below, all main themes (blue) and sub themes (yellow) have been presented. The conceptual model of this research includes five categories of environmental factors (individual environmental barriers and organizational environmental barriers), technology factors (lack of infrastructure and lack of recognition of technology), awareness and knowledge factors (unwillingness to find knowledge and lack of awareness of employees), economic factors (cost) and human resource factors (lack of willingness to change, lack of cooperation, non-commitment, lack of support of top management and lack of attention to strategic goals).

The results of the ranking of options with TOPSIS technique indicate that the A2 option is superior to other options. The results of ranking by TOPSIS method showed that the barriers to knowledge with CL value 1=1 were identified as the most important one to implement Green Hospital standards in Imam Hassan Mojtaba Hospital of Darab. The technology barriers index with CL value of 0.690 was in the second place, then the human barriers index with CL=0.493, economic barriers with CL=0.39 and environmental barriers with CL=0.223 were the next priorities.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

One of the most important issues that is being discussed globally today is the protection of environment. Studying the standard of the Green Hospital is very important because hospitals are the second most polluting industry in the environment. By applying standards for hospitals, it is possible to help environmental protection. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify and prioritize the barriers to implement Green Hospital standards in Imam Hassan Mojtaba Hospital in Darab. The results of this study showed that the conceptual model of this research includes five categories of environmental factors (individual environmental barriers and organizational environmental barriers), technology factors (lack of infrastructure and lack of recognition of technology), knowledge and awareness (unwillingness to find awareness and lack of awareness of employees), economic (costs) and human resource factors (unwillingness to change, lack of cooperation, non-commitment, lack of support from top management and inattention to strategic goals), out of which the barriers to awareness and knowledge were the most important barriers to implement Green Hospital standards in Imam Hasan Mojtaba Hospital in Darab.

In this regard, Ghasemiyeh et al., in a paper titled "Barriers to implement green supply chain management in Bushehr hospitals, mentioned lack of awareness and knowledge as one of the main factors in non-implementation of green activities. Their result was consistent with the present research 8. Mohebifar et al. in a paper titled "Evaluation of Hamedan hospitals based on the standards of the green hospital in 2015, identified lack of awareness and knowledge as one of the most important obstacles to implement the Green Hospital. Their research result was consistent with the present study9. Another result of the present study, which was in the second place, indicates that the lack of recognition of technology is an important obstacle to implement Green Hospital standards. Balaji et al. in a paper on barriers to implement the green supply chain, mentioned lack of recognition of technology as an important barrier to non-implementation of green supply chain management. Their research results are consistent with the present research10.

Another result of this study is the impact of the lack of infrastructure for IT as one of the most important obstacles to the implementation of Green Hospital standards. Mohammad Jafari et al., in an article on barriers to implement the green supply chain in the industries, stated that lack of infrastructure for information technology is a major obstacle to the implementation of the green supply green supply chain. Their research result was consistent with the present study11. Ghasemiyeh et al. in the research on the barriers to implement green supply chain management in Bushehr hospitals pointed out them as one of the most important barriers to implement the green supply chain, and their result is consistent with that of this study8. The lack of support of top management was another barrier to implement the Green Hospital standards, which was identified in this study. In this regard, Balasubramanian  also mentions top management's lack of support as one of barriers to implement green supply chain management, which is consistent with the results of the present study12. In a paper entitled Barriers to Implement Green Supply Chain Management in the automobile industry, Luthra et al.  mentioned lack of support of top management as an important factor in non-implementation of green supply chain management. The result is consistent with the results of the present study13.

In addition, the results of this study showed that non-commitment is one of the important barriers to implement the Green Hospital. In this regard, Balaji et al. in a paper entitled "Barriers to implement the green supply chain mentioned non-commitment as an important barrier to non-implementation of the green supply chain. And in another study entitled barriers to implement the green supply chain, they consider non-commitment as an important barrier to implement green supply chain management6. Balasubramanian consider the top management's non-commitment as the most important barrier to implement the Green Hospital 14. In another study by Mohammad Jafari et al. on the barriers to implement the green supply chain in industries, they identified non-commitment as an important obstacle. The results of all above studies were consistent with those of the present study11.

Another result of this study is the impact of costs as one of the most important obstacles to the implementation of Green Hospital standards. In this regard, Ghasemiyeh et al. referred to the cost of implementation as one of the important obstacles to the implementation of the Green Hospital in a study entitled "Barriers to Implement Green Supply Chain Management in Bushehr Hospitals", which result is consistent with the result of this research8.  In another study by Mohammad Jafari et al. entitled "Reviewing the Barriers to Implement Green Supply Chain in Industries", the impact of cost on the non-implementation of the green chain was emphasized. The result of their research was also consistent with that of the present study11.

Other indicators in the research have not been considered. In this study, they were considered by interviews with experts of Imam Hassan Mojtaba Hospital of Darab. It can be said that the present research is innovative in terms of some indicators such as individual environmental barriers, organizational environmental barriers, lack of cooperation, lack of willingness to find knowledge and inattention to find recognition. Therefore, it is necessary to recognize the place of implementation of green hospital standards in the health system of the country in order to formulate strategy and to make effective use of this standard in the health of the community. Therefore, conduction of this research in other hospitals and identification and removal of barriers to implement Green Hospital standards are recommended to help hospital management initiate strategies that increase the potential of energy saving in the hospital, such as: Creating a culture of energy conservation, the physical role of the hospital building to save energy, and the use of smart control systems, and thus it will further align with the standards of the green hospital. It is also suggested that extra-organizational variables which hinder the implementation of green hospitals should be considered in future studies such as lack of governmental support.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No conflict of interest associated with this work.

REFERENCES

  1. Karliner J, Genther H. A comprehensive environment health care agenda for hospital and health systems around the world. Health care. 2011; 1-11.
  2. Wood L, Wang C, Abdul-Rahman H, Jamal Abdul-Nasir, N. Green hospital design: integrating quality function deployment and end-user demands’. J Cleaner Production. 2015; 1-11.
  3. Esa A, Alma R. Healthy Hospitals, Healthy Planet, 2011.
  4. Luthra S, Kumar V, Kumar S, Haleem A. Barriers to implement green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique-An Indian perspective. Industrial engineering and management. 2011; 4(2), 231-257.
  5. Dashore K, Sohani N. Green Supply Chain Management: A Hierarchical Framework for Barriers’. Int J Eng Tren Tech. 2013; 41(5), 2172-2183.
  6. Balaji M, Velmurugan V, Manikanda P. ‘Barriers In Green Supply Chain Management: An Indian Foundry Perspective’. Int J Res Eng Tech. 2014; 3(7), 423-430.
  7. Omidvar S, Saidi H, Isian Rastegar L, Kouhi Janaghid S. Studying the relationship between the function of green supply chain and operational function by green supply chain management, the first engineering meeting of industries and systems. 2015; 1-9.
  8. Ghasemiyeh R, Shahbandzade H, Yazdanparast F. The barriers to implement green supply chain management in governmental hospitals of Boushehr, the first International congress of management, economy and development, 2015.
  9. Mohebifar R, Rouhollah K, Azmal M, Zanganeh Gheshlaghi F. Evaluation of Hamedan hospitals based on green hospital standards in 2015, M.A thesis, 2015.
  10. Mohammad Jafari M, Shokrizadeh R, Heidari M, Parvaresh S. Studying barriers to implement green supply chain management in Iranian industries using hierarchical approach.
  11. Balasubramanian S. A hierarchical framework of barriers to green supply chain management in the construction sector. J Sustainable Dev. 2012; 5(10), 15-28.
  12. Hwang CL, Yoon K. Multiple attributes decision making methods and application. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1981.

 

Table 1: Conceptual categories regarding human barriers' theme

Main theme no.

Description of main theme

Sub-theme no.

Description of sub-theme

Concept no.

Description of concept

Code no.

A

Human barriers

A1

Lack of support

of managers

A1-1

Financial support of managers

E2-A2-C3-F2-G4

A1-2

Emotional support of managers

-I2-H4-D3

A2

Unwillingness to change

A2-1

Satisfaction

B4-C3-F3-H2-J3

A2-2

Resistance against change

E4-H3-C3

A2-3

Cost of change implementation

F3-H2-J3

A2-4

inattention to the environment

B4-C3-F3

A2-5

Concerning about change

H3-C3

A3

Lack of cooperation

A3-1

Non-alignment of sectors

A2-C3-F2-G4

A3-2

Lack of facilities

C3-F3-G4

A3-3

Lack of attention

-C3-F2-G4

A3-4

Lack of social responsibility

C3 -G4

A4

Inattention to strategic goals

A4-1

Not considering green hospital in goals

A2- G4

A4-2

Non-alignment of all goals

H3-C3

 

 

A5

Human resource

A5-1

Lack of trained resource

B4-C3-F3-H2-J3

A5-2

Non-commitment

E4-H3-C3

  

Table 2: Conceptual categories regarding economic barriers' theme

Main theme no.

Description of main theme

Sub-theme no.

Description of sub-theme

Concept no.

Description of concept

Code no.

B

Economic barriers

B1

cost

B1-1

The cost of facilities for implementing green hospitals

E2-A2-C3-F2-G4

B1-2

Cost-effectiveness

C3-F3-G4-I2-H4-D3

  

Table 3: Conceptual categories regarding awareness and knowledge barriers theme

Main theme no.

Description of main theme

Sub-theme no.

Description of sub-theme

Concept no.

Description of concept

Code no.

C

awareness and knowledge barriers

C1

Lack of awareness of staff

C1-1

Lack of awareness of staff regarding benefits of green hospital standards

E2-A2-C3-F2-G4

C1-2

Lack of awareness of top management regarding its outcomes

C3-F3-G4-I2-H4-D3

C1-3

Lack of awareness of staff about required technologies

C3-H2-D3

C2

Unwillingness to knowledge and awareness

C2-1

Difficult access to goals

B4-C3-F3-H2-J3

C2-2

Being satisfied with current state of hospital

E4-H3-C3

C2-3

Modeling of managers for knowledge creation

B4-C3-F3

  

Table 4: Conceptual categories regarding technological barrier theme

Main theme no.

Description of main theme

Sub-theme no.

Description of sub-theme

Concept no.

Description of concept

Code no.

A

Barriers to technology

A1

 

Lack of recognition of technology

A1-1

Lack of recognition of technology by employees

E2-A2-C3-F2-G4

A1-2

Lack of recognition of current processes

C3-F3-G4-I2-H4-D3

A2-3

Lack of training for applying new technologies

C3-H2-D3

 

Complex application of technology

 

A2

Lack of infrastructures

A3-1

Making essential infrastructures to access the goals

B4-C3-F3-H2-J3

  

Table 5: Conceptual categories regarding environmental barriers theme

Main theme no.

Description of main theme

Sub-theme no.

Description of sub-theme

Concept no.

Description of concept

Code no.

E

Environmental barriers 

E1

 

Individual

E1-1

Lack of effectiveness of the activity of each person

E2-A2-C3-F2-G4

E2

Organizational 

E2-1

Sense of lack of harms of hospital wastes

B4-C3-F3-H2-J3

E2-2

Sense of lack of organizational effectiveness on the environment

E4-H3-C3

 

 

Figure 1: Ranking of options using TOPSIS

Table 6: Ranking of options

Row

Options

Distance to positive ideal

Distance to negative ideal

CL

Rank

1

A1

0.067

0.065

0.493

3

2

A2

0

0.107

1

1

3

A3

0.72

0.046

0.39

4

4

A4

0.038

0.085

0.69

2

5

A5

0.096

0.028

0.223

5

 

Table 7: Ranking of the main barriers

Row

Barrier

Rank

1

Barriers to knowledge and awareness

1

2

Barriers to technology

2

3

Human barriers

3

4

Economic barriers

4

5

Environmental barriers

5