RETRACTED- THE NATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR THE MASS TREATMENT OF TRACHOMA: MONITORING COVERAGE AND PRACTICES OF MASS DRUG ADMINISTRATION (MDA) IN YEMEN- FOLLOW-UP STUDY

Essam Yahya A Alshamahi; Sameha  A. Al-Eryani; Bushra Mohammed Jaadan; Prof. Dr. Hassan A. Al-Shamahy; Amal Abdulslam Al Haddad; Baleegh Abdullah Al-Zazai

doi:10.22270/ujpr.v6i2.561

Essam Yahya A Alshamahi Opthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana’a University, Republic of Yemen.
Sameha A. Al-Eryani Opthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana’a University, Republic of Yemen.
Bushra Mohammed Jaadan Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sana’a University, Republic of Yemen
Prof. Dr. Hassan A. Al-Shamahy Medical Microbiology and Clinical Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana’a University, Republic of Yemen.
Amal Abdulslam Al Haddad Medical Microbiology and Clinical Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana’a University, Republic of Yemen.
Baleegh Abdullah Al-Zazai Medical Microbiology and Clinical Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana’a University, Republic of Yemen.

10.22270/ujpr.v6i2.561

Keywords:

coverage, mass drug administration (MDA), mass treatment, monitoring, national campaign, trachoma, Yemen

Abstract

Background: Trachoma is a communicable infection of the eye by certain strains of the Chlamydia trachomatis. It is the principal cause of loss of sight globally. Mass drug administration (MDA) with azithromycin is a foundation stone of World Health Organization (WHO)’s global struggle to eradicate trachoma by 2020.

Aims: The main objectives of the campaign's third monitoring are to check improvement of interventions and improvement of quality across times and activities implemented in seven selected districts of Ibb and Al-Hodeida governorates, Yemen.

Methods: A community based cross-sectional coverage survey was performed. 68 divisions were selected per selected districts of the two governorates. A disconnect Results Entry Form for each district surveyed was finished, saved and uploaded directly into the online Coverage Survey Analysis Tool to check improvement of interventions and improvement of quality across times and activities implemented.

Results: The national campaign for MDA covers 966 villages in 6 districts of Ibb and Al-Hodeidah governorates by 1932 healthcare workers. A total number of beneficiaries who were monitored from 476 homes reached 3,077, of whom 2,755 (90%, coverage rate) took the dose. The availability rates of trachoma medicines were ranged from 82% to 91% . The improper arrangement of treatment sessions rate was 17%, the incorrect position of the dose pole was 6%, while the correct records of drugs scored the rate of 99%, and the proper storage of drugs rate was 70%. The community collaboration during the treatment campaign the acceptable rate was 92%, while 3% exhibited unacceptable behaviors towards the treatment campaign.

Conclusion: In this survey, the national campaign for MDA in the 966 villages reach the target threshold (i.e. 90%) for effective coverage; with proper rates for the availability of trachoma medicines, good people reactions towards taking treatment, and the community collaboration; while bad rates for the improper arrangement of treatment sessions , the incorrect position of the dose pole and the preparation dosages by MDA team. Hence, programmatic enhancement should be made for the future campaign to achieve the estimated thresholds.

Peer Review History:

Received 8 March 2021; Revised 29 March; Accepted 25 April, Available online 15 May 2021

UJPR follows the most transparent and toughest ‘Advanced OPEN peer review’ system. The identity of the authors and, reviewers will be known to each other. This transparent process will help to eradicate any possible malicious/purposeful interference by any person (publishing staff, reviewer, editor, author, etc) during peer review. As a result of this unique system, all reviewers will get their due recognition and respect, once their names are published in the papers. We expect that, by publishing peer review reports with published papers, will be helpful to many authors for drafting their article according to the specifications. Auhors will remove any error of their article and they will improve their article(s) according to the previous reports displayed with published article(s). The main purpose of it is ‘to improve the quality of a candidate manuscript’. Our reviewers check the ‘strength and weakness of a manuscript honestly’. There will increase in the perfection, and transparency.

Received file: Reviewer's Comments: