NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION, CONSTITUENTS, AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY OF POWDER FRACTIONS OF FICUS DICRANOSTYLA MILDBREAD LEAVES
Keywords:
Antioxidant, Ficus dicranostyla, mineral compositionsAbstract
Background and objective: The research on nutritional and health-benefiting compounds has increased in leafy vegetables such as Ficus dicranostyla.The current study was conducted to evaluate the effect of sieved-based fractionation on nutrient content, polyphenolic components, and antioxidant activities of Ficus dicranostyla leaves powder.
Methods: Dried leaves powder was sieved at three size classes (<125 µm, between 250 and 125µm, ≥ 250 µm) and unsieved powder was produced and characterized for proximate composition, minerals, total phenolic, and flavonoids contents, as well as antioxidant activity. Nutrient quantities were expressed in g/100g of crude leaves.
Results: Statistics resultsrevealed a significant difference among fractions composition, as well as antioxidant activity with DPPH and FRAP. Proteins (19.60-26.08), lipids (5.33-10.40), and ash (11.44 16.60) contents were increased in small size fractions, while carbohydrates (40.19-50.88) and fibers (9.08–15.04) contents were lowered. Similarly, minerals namely iron, copper, magnesium, and zinc increased (3.26-9.68, 9.09-24.41, 1.38-2.33, and 3.79-8.55 g/100 g, respectively). In addition, phenolic compounds and flavonoids, as well as antioxidant activity were also higher in smaller powder particles. The powder fraction of < 125 µm (smaller particle) showed the highest phenolic content and antioxidant activity, demonstrating the importance of sizing in the profitability of functional food ingredients.
Conclusion: Data analysis clearly demonstrates that Ficus dicranostyla leaf powder could be recognized as a source of nutritive compounds and antioxidants. Ficus dicranostyla derived functional ingredients could be prepared for the nutritive purpose and oxidative stress-related disease prevention.
Peer Review History:
Received: 5 June 2022; Revised: 11 July; Accepted: 24 August; Available online: 15 September 2022
Academic Editor: Dr. Marwa A. A. Fayed, University of Sadat City, Egypt, maafayed@gmail.com
Received file: Reviewer's Comments:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 7.0/10
Reviewers:
Dr. Sangeetha Arullappan, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia, sangeetha@utar.edu.my
Ahmad Najib, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Makassar, Indonesia, ahmad.najib@umi.ac.id
Dr. Marwa A. A. Fayed, University of Sadat City, Egypt, maafayed@gmail.com
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.